I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
lsee tables 11,12 & l3l. The cen<strong>tr</strong>al lendency rcmains, howev€r,<br />
toward the Diddle two soaies j.€., 'ive'iset ard 'big'. This pobl<br />
ne€ds some reflectior! as rhere se€ms to be some con<strong>tr</strong>adiction<br />
b€tw6 what the studeDis exprelsed in thc 6rst qu€stjon iD which<br />
the sme stvdents arc in favor ofthe leam€r-oenteEd app.oach. Ore<br />
losrible iderpretatior io this is that th.y tly io goup towar& th€<br />
c€nter becaule this question .sks them how much lhey have leamt<br />
they do Dot warn !o lxlrqer.ie how Duch th€y Iwe learDl so that<br />
they are <strong>tr</strong>E to themselv€s. This kind of b€havior i! also tue to<br />
tMy YeltMis who do not wa<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong> to exrggent€ p€rsonal tbjns<br />
i<strong>tr</strong>cludiDs l.ding,<br />
TIle last ou.stion in ser 'A' has lo do wilh rhe studeds'<br />
adtude ioward usire ihe lade approach in fi.tuE j! lea.bing<br />
E slish. As can b. seen nom fte tabl€s (l I,12, & 13), almost all of<br />
{re r€spondcDts $y lhey agr€c- Od ofthe totsl oumber in lh€ i<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>hr</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>e€<br />
schools (208) or y (4) studeds say th€ complerely dilagr€e with dle<br />
id€a On the othcr b3D4 rhc n'.'nber for dlo6e who cobpletely.Sre€<br />
i(107); the difrcteG ir scf+vid. .<br />
6.42.b S.. B. Qm.l,or.<strong>tr</strong>.:<br />
The Queslions in lhis list ar. oFn-crdcd ,nd th€r€forc th€<br />
list DNt be longs. For tbis rc5son ii ha b€€il foud appropriare io<br />
focus only on those itdns filt at! of the hiSlEst n€quen y and<br />
which are slEred in the t}lre s.bool!. So tabl€6 (14 & 15) sr€<br />
squeerrd !o contajr oDly lhos€ it <s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tn</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>s that arE relcwnt !o study.<br />
This questio rsift is inwstigating the students' r€sction io a<br />
cetuin exp€den € and tbe rcsponses ar€ natualy cithd ld or<br />
againsl it. This me8Ds two oa&gori* arE necessary for th€<br />
classfication of th. r€spo'ses. ]}o!e respoNer l}st ar€ for the<br />
applic<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ion of leameFc€$er€d approach 8rc thus call€dposnn, ard<br />
!ho6e that ar€ against it are called nega/}l.-<br />
6.2.2.b,r Pogiitve Vi€$/sr<br />
As shown in table (14) the r€spomes ar! pd accoding to<br />
lheir fequency and relevanc€ ro the leamer-centered experieme. So