28.01.2013 Views

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lsee tables 11,12 & l3l. The cen<strong>tr</strong>al lendency rcmains, howev€r,<br />

toward the Diddle two soaies j.€., 'ive'iset ard 'big'. This pobl<br />

ne€ds some reflectior! as rhere se€ms to be some con<strong>tr</strong>adiction<br />

b€tw6 what the studeDis exprelsed in thc 6rst qu€stjon iD which<br />

the sme stvdents arc in favor ofthe leam€r-oenteEd app.oach. Ore<br />

losrible iderpretatior io this is that th.y tly io goup towar& th€<br />

c€nter becaule this question .sks them how much lhey have leamt<br />

they do Dot warn !o lxlrqer.ie how Duch th€y Iwe learDl so that<br />

they are <strong>tr</strong>E to themselv€s. This kind of b€havior i! also tue to<br />

tMy YeltMis who do not wa<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong> to exrggent€ p€rsonal tbjns<br />

i<strong>tr</strong>cludiDs l.ding,<br />

TIle last ou.stion in ser 'A' has lo do wilh rhe studeds'<br />

adtude ioward usire ihe lade approach in fi.tuE j! lea.bing<br />

E slish. As can b. seen nom fte tabl€s (l I,12, & 13), almost all of<br />

{re r€spondcDts $y lhey agr€c- Od ofthe totsl oumber in lh€ i<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>hr</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>e€<br />

schools (208) or y (4) studeds say th€ complerely dilagr€e with dle<br />

id€a On the othcr b3D4 rhc n'.'nber for dlo6e who cobpletely.Sre€<br />

i(107); the difrcteG ir scf+vid. .<br />

6.42.b S.. B. Qm.l,or.<strong>tr</strong>.:<br />

The Queslions in lhis list ar. oFn-crdcd ,nd th€r€forc th€<br />

list DNt be longs. For tbis rc5son ii ha b€€il foud appropriare io<br />

focus only on those itdns filt at! of the hiSlEst n€quen y and<br />

which are slEred in the t}lre s.bool!. So tabl€6 (14 & 15) sr€<br />

squeerrd !o contajr oDly lhos€ it <s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tn</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>s that arE relcwnt !o study.<br />

This questio rsift is inwstigating the students' r€sction io a<br />

cetuin exp€den € and tbe rcsponses ar€ natualy cithd ld or<br />

againsl it. This me8Ds two oa&gori* arE necessary for th€<br />

classfication of th. r€spo'ses. ]}o!e respoNer l}st ar€ for the<br />

applic<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ion of leameFc€$er€d approach 8rc thus call€dposnn, ard<br />

!ho6e that ar€ against it are called nega/}l.-<br />

6.2.2.b,r Pogiitve Vi€$/sr<br />

As shown in table (14) the r€spomes ar! pd accoding to<br />

lheir fequency and relevanc€ ro the leamer-centered experieme. So

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!