I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and pragnalics (Stem: in Alitis dd Allrn& 1981: 133)<br />
'PEgnatics' sas o<strong>tr</strong>€rcd by Oll€r as an alG@rjr,e lo lhose<br />
linguistic lheories (S1em: 131). Pragrnatics places emphasis on rcal<br />
larguage use. OIer wanted to sce the Dotion of de€P sErcture<br />
rcinteprctcd 6 meaning: relation between situstional sitlina ad<br />
li<strong>tr</strong>guistic fonn ntber tbd relation between se<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>enc€s and<br />
underlying sentences (deep/sudace sliuctue) O er claims that<br />
pragmatics has implioatiors for lmguage te&hit$ he identifies tbe<br />
goat of ieaching a languSe a indu.ing tlE sludenb not merety lo<br />
m3Dipulat€ meairingl€ss solnd sequeDces, bu! ro sod ard rcceive<br />
messages in rhe language. Henc€ emerges th€ lem<br />
'connuication' which tl€n form€d the bais for the<br />
@n1''Micative lmsuge te&hing (CLT) 4 a very comprehdii€<br />
approach rc lDorc effective languaSe l€ching and thus leibi<strong>tr</strong>&<br />
'It|e nain emphasis ofdE CLT is th€ fact that the fomnl or<br />
stuc<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>hr</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>.l rheories view lmguaAe outside a panjcula. cont€n of<br />
ldau8e use. This is as a rcsuh of orer concenFation on usage,<br />
whicb may ofim iav. effect of pu<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ing lhe larguage being lemi at<br />
a rcmove 6om the leamers' own €xper;ence of language<br />
(Widdowsor- 1987:17). lE co|mBi@dv€ tlpory, on the other<br />
hmd, presents the second languaSe in a no€ clearly spsified<br />
social co<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ext md siruation in which lmgug€ actualy wori6. In<br />
other words, by focBing on 'Be' E$er than 'u!age', the<br />
corDiohi.<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ivo apFoach th@rists haw a<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>enpted to com€ closer io<br />
the reality of lmguS€ use (Stem: in Alitis ad Altud l9El:259).<br />
Hs@fonl! uses oflanguage were to be specified i! so.ial se<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ings<br />
much mo.e precisely in expectadon that lan$rage pedagog/ would<br />
rh@by b€corne 6ore r.l.vant 10 the subj€ctive and objetive n€eds<br />
ofthe le3rneB- The defnition and idedfication ofthde n€€ds bas<br />
cor3titued fnt dd inpo<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>mt stage in the prcceduE to Mke<br />
langlage teaching conmuicative. The second slage has been the<br />
definition of <s<strong>tr</strong>ong>hr</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>yuasc etesories in s@tic (mti@t) a sie<br />
linguislic terG (nedoDal).<br />
Ite tcacbing materials and techniqu.s, which are based on<br />
socio-linguistic principls NUAIy, ideltiry b!l16 in a sp€cific<br />
rcle of languge use. Th€ inteEcdois ale ofl.n spe.ified as shop<br />
a3sjstanl - cutomef, forcign b?veler - poliema4 doctor - patist