I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

in the tlr€e schools fsvor this new approach lt is very impo<strong>rt</strong>ant to
notice that lhe fequency of nary resPonses io this table is hjgh€'
tho that ofnegative ones as shown in Lble (15) below lhis is true
to the tlree schools. For more detaib look at lecdon [6.2] blow.
Set B. Neg<strong>rt</strong>ive Results of Que3tiontraire
fRDQ
x E
'Itis aDDrcen is slo* dd litu coN.ing
T@h.r d@s rcl Day an.ntion lo misi.t s
Sotr nud.nb do mr e Ensbh ir gou!t!94
Som strd.nB do mt fouow ks6 3
SonElim l@td sDc.b Ssr (mt foUov.d) l0 2
6 trsc e rc1 @Epkl.d 0 l0 2
A lot ofmi* ie turL duirs trcuD w* 2 l
8 Tdbd witiDs on Bb ! i&gibL 2 0 0
9 T@hd dc Bt rnd<strong>hr</strong>c inro Aatra 2
l0 fh.E ir .or .D!sn wnins 0 0 2
ll N6 cbe. is ciq lo rudcds 'o wir. on Bb
l2 T.nhoo*s d ot im.Esine 0
l3 Teb6 do6 ml chcl IFB wle 0 o
l4 T@br d6 ftr e Bb ro nirc on t0 0
In rhe hblc (15) above, lhe regalive..spoEcs lo the op€F
end€d quesrion of dle dinSs they like or dislike abod lhe l€3me.c€rler€d
exp€.i@ sr. giv€n. All thc 14 items sho* a negative
a<strong>tt</strong>inrde lowads $e idca of leamer-ccnt€rcdrEss. However, orc
can eisily rccosnize the low n€quency of..ch ilcm a! comlared
b the positjve a<strong>tt</strong>inrde in th€ previous s€ctior Wlile th€ frEquelcy
of d|e frst resatilt item in lable (lr) is 3,4,md 6 ;n the lnre€
sch@ls rBp€ctivelt it is 42,45 dd 39 tur itd one io the pGitive
cat€gory. 'Ihis mrkes th€ diff€rcnc€. Hcncc, one ce say t<strong>hr</strong>l the
general a<strong>tt</strong>itud. of thc ltude s towards lhe idci is positive. For a
d€ta en €xplarution s€e s€ctioD [6.2]