I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

5.3 l4.rere<strong>rt</strong> red Activitie3
As a Blll ofmalerial adapt<strong>rt</strong>ions and ftom what has b€€n
found tom $e cla$roon observatiors and, tlt€ folowing activitias
a'd lechniques are found to b€ compatible and suitablc to lhe
I. DISCUSSION:
In this qperinent, discussion wa! a common pEctice
durirg .irDost rh. ehole exp€rierce. lt took various fonns all of
which share th€ elements of leameHenteredness. these fonis e
r. Dieulstor ld by tcr.her:
Her€ the teachcr initialed or sbned rhe topic of discussion.
Aner thc teechet-researcbs !!d srated the topic, tlF discLrsion
$aned b€twen lhe reacher on <strong>tt</strong>E one hand and $e sNdents (rhe
whole clals) oD th€ oth€r. Ther€ were tines during the discus.sion
wlr€n the teachei tlad to dir€ct the shearn ofthe discussion ro the
already plaEEd orE. Thjs do€s nor rnean dlst every lhing wed
srDothly; the tscher h.d to b€ rcady for .ny probl€m or difrcu<strong>tt</strong>y
tlat might aris by ill€ studeDts. nley ma, for s(ar0ple, n!.d son€
cldficalion ofa word or exprcssion eic. So the teacher <strong>hr</strong>! ro b€
availablc not ot y as a paiicipant bu also he h6s to dpect
questom by lhe stud€nB duing the discrEsior A ti.al ex3Dple
of this t}?e of dilcrirsior is lesson (l) of rlE wo'Lbook ISe!
appendix No. 31. In this lessor\ ii is the teacher who will, eveil@ly
say the fnsl Nwer to the giv€! blrrk or al lelst wbo wil agE or
disag.e with lhe studenls who Plovided thc anlwer. Ihis rote by
lhe lelc<strong>hr</strong> shodd bc plsyed ody ans the sludqts bave ti.d ben
best lo fird or determine d|e con ct Gwo. The ultinate rotes of
both Oe leacher and ieam€ls is cleirly sraled in $e folowing lires
" Studmb shodd psnicipare in convesalion conrrolt€d by the
teacb.r, bur es $e sruderfs b@im FmficicDr tE le€chd should