15.02.2013 Views

The Lolita Complex: - Scholarly Commons Home

The Lolita Complex: - Scholarly Commons Home

The Lolita Complex: - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Loli-Pop was an exploration into the G&L movement with a focus on<br />

the <strong>Lolita</strong> subculture and its relationship with popular culture, thus the title<br />

Loli = “<strong>Lolita</strong>” + Pop = “popular culture”. Our initial intention was to<br />

exhibit original Japanese <strong>Lolita</strong> garments, specifically examples delineating<br />

the separate categories of Gothic <strong>Lolita</strong>, Sweet <strong>Lolita</strong>, Country <strong>Lolita</strong>, Punk<br />

<strong>Lolita</strong> and Classic <strong>Lolita</strong>, supported by street photography in the vein of<br />

Aoki, and authentic items of popular culture, fashion accessories, manga-<br />

graphic novels and dolls. <strong>The</strong> designer labels we were looking to display<br />

were mainly Mana’s Moi-même-Moitié, Baby the Stars Shine Bright, Metamorphose<br />

and Angelic Pretty. This grand vision happened in part.<br />

Our initial hurdle was in convincing all parties of the validity of this<br />

exercise as it was not foreseen as the draw card that it would become. After<br />

that, the most challenging episode was the argument that ensued over the<br />

naming of the show in the first instance. <strong>The</strong> issue was that both the words,<br />

“<strong>Lolita</strong>” and “Gothic”, were considered too controversial. Admittedly,<br />

“<strong>Lolita</strong>” is a loaded term. Negativity attached to this word was exacerbated<br />

when email exchanges between Chuang and myself, containing “<strong>Lolita</strong>” in<br />

either the subject fields and or bodies of messages, and copied to contact<br />

addresses of Museum management staff members, were continually blocked<br />

by the system and recognised as “offensive”. It also appeared, however, that<br />

“Gothic” invited its own stigma, especially in relation to “Goth”, creating a<br />

panic that our topic was unsuitable for the reputation of the Institution.<br />

Both titles were subsequently banned from usage.<br />

Page | 247

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!