01.06.2013 Views

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P2-05<br />

YAEM 2010<br />

YÖNEYLEM ARAÞTIRMASI VE ENDÜSTRÝ MÜHENDÝSLÝGI 30. ULUSAL KONGRESÝ<br />

Risk Analizi <strong>ve</strong> Yönetimi 2: Risk Analysis and Management<br />

1 Temmuz 2010 / 10:00 - 11:30<br />

Oturum Salonu: MDBF L047<br />

Oturum Baþkaný: Sinan Erzurumlu<br />

Production, Process In<strong>ve</strong>stment and the Survival of Debt<br />

Financed Startup Firms<br />

1 2 3<br />

Fehmi Tanrise<strong>ve</strong>r , Sinan Erzurumlu , Nitin Joglekar<br />

1 Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences,<br />

Eindho<strong>ve</strong>n Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity of Technology, Eindho<strong>ve</strong>n, The Netherlands<br />

2 Technology, Operations and Information Management Division,<br />

Babson College, Boston, USA<br />

3 Department of Operations and Technology Management, Boston<br />

Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity, Boston, USA<br />

Whether to in<strong>ve</strong>st in process de<strong>ve</strong>lopment that can reduce the unit<br />

cost and thereby raise future profits or to conser<strong>ve</strong> cash and reduce<br />

the likelihood of bankruptcy is a key concern faced by many startup<br />

firms that ha<strong>ve</strong> taken on debt. We explore this concern by examining<br />

the production quantity and cost-reducing R&D in<strong>ve</strong>stment decisions<br />

in a two period model. A startup firm must generate sufficient cash<br />

flows to meet its current debt obligations at the end of the first period<br />

to survi<strong>ve</strong> and secure future financing in the following period. We<br />

show that under a base case, with deterministic demand, such a<br />

startup should produce the monopoly quantity and use an in<strong>ve</strong>st-all-<br />

or-nothing in<strong>ve</strong>stment policy. Howe<strong>ve</strong>r, under stochastic demand and<br />

allied survival constraint, the optimal in<strong>ve</strong>stment policy does not<br />

necessarily ha<strong>ve</strong> an all-or-nothing character. In this case, we establish<br />

conditions for creating hedges through either aggressi<strong>ve</strong> or<br />

conservati<strong>ve</strong> in<strong>ve</strong>stment and operating alternati<strong>ve</strong>s.<br />

Information Technology Risk and Return Trade-off: New<br />

Evidence from Recent Data<br />

1 2 3<br />

Gokcen Arkali , Indranil Bardhan , Vish Krishnan<br />

1 Prairie View A&M Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity<br />

2 Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity of Texas at Dallas<br />

3 Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity of California at San Diego<br />

1183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!