01.06.2013 Views

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

Ayrıntılı Bilimsel Program ve Bildiri Özetleri - YAEM2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YAEM 2010<br />

YÖNEYLEM ARAÞTIRMASI VE ENDÜSTRÝ MÜHENDÝSLÝGI 30. ULUSAL KONGRESÝ<br />

Prior literature is rich in terms of the productivity and profitability<br />

impact of IT but it is limited in terms of explaining the IT risk-return<br />

relationship. E<strong>ve</strong>n the existing research on the impact of IT<br />

in<strong>ve</strong>stments on firm risk measures such as earnings or stock-returns<br />

volatility is not still well established. A recent empirical study by<br />

Dewan, Shi, and Gurbaxani (2007) has established a link between IT<br />

risk and IT return using a production function framework. Howe<strong>ve</strong>r,<br />

their dataset spans a time period which do not allow them to see the<br />

impact of post-Internet era. We conduct a replication analysis of<br />

Dewan, Shi, and Gurbaxani (2007) with a recent and unique dataset<br />

spanning across fairly different firms and industry segments in order<br />

to test their findings and interpret the differences that we disco<strong>ve</strong>r<br />

between the two empirical analyses. While we find little support on<br />

the relati<strong>ve</strong> contribution of IT on firm risk, we support the highly<br />

positi<strong>ve</strong> return on IT among high IT risk firms. Our results shed new<br />

light on the IT risk-return relationship.<br />

Is Better Nuclear Weapon Detection Capability Justified?<br />

1 2<br />

Onur Bakýr , Detlof Von Wýnterfeldt<br />

1 Bilkent Uni<strong>ve</strong>rsity, Industrial Engineering Department<br />

2 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg,<br />

Austria<br />

We present a decision tree model to evaluate the next generation<br />

radiation portals to scan containers entering the United States non-<br />

intrusi<strong>ve</strong>ly against nuclear weapons. Advanced Spectroscopic Portals<br />

(ASPs) are compared against current designs of portal monitors<br />

(PVTs). We consider fi<strong>ve</strong> alternati<strong>ve</strong>s: 1) Exclusi<strong>ve</strong> deployment of<br />

ASPs 2) Sequential deployment of ASPs with PVTs installing ASPs in<br />

secondary and some primary inspections areas, 3) Sequential<br />

deployment of ASPs with PVTs installing ASPs in only secondary<br />

inspections areas, 4) Exclusi<strong>ve</strong> deployment of PVTs, 5) Continue<br />

inspections with the current capacity. The baseline solution<br />

recommends a strategy that supports the deployment of ASPs for<br />

secondary inspections and PVTs for primary inspections. This solution<br />

is <strong>ve</strong>ry sensiti<strong>ve</strong> to the probability of attack attempt, the type of<br />

weapon shipped through ports of entry, the probability of successful<br />

detonation, detection probabilities and the deterrence benefit of each<br />

alternati<strong>ve</strong>.<br />

1184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!