198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...
198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...
198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40 J.P. Glusker<br />
7.1<br />
Descriptions of Hydrogen-Bond<strong>in</strong>g Networks<br />
Exten<strong>de</strong>d networks of hydrogen bonds are found <strong>in</strong> many crystal structures<br />
and, as they run cont<strong>in</strong>uously through the crystal, they act cooperatively [3] with<br />
lower energy than expected from the sum of the energies of the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen-bond<strong>in</strong>g schemes <strong>in</strong> crystal structures are readily<br />
analyzed, provi<strong>de</strong>d all the hydrogen atoms have been <strong>in</strong>clu<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
crystal structure. It is simply a matter of <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>teratomic distances<br />
and angles between hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the<br />
periodicity and space-group symmetry of the crystal structure.<br />
Graph theory has been used [30, 84] as a method for <strong>de</strong>scrib<strong>in</strong>g such hydrogen<br />
bond<strong>in</strong>g. The pattern is <strong>de</strong>scribed as G, where G <strong>de</strong>scribes the type (S for self<br />
or <strong>in</strong>tramolecular, D for noncyclic f<strong>in</strong>ite pattern such as a dimer, R for r<strong>in</strong>gs, and<br />
C for cha<strong>in</strong>s). The sub- and superscripts d and a refer to the number of donors<br />
and acceptors, and r is the size of the pattern. This scheme highlights exten<strong>de</strong>d<br />
systems of hydrogen bonds and similarities and differences of patterns of<br />
hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crystals of related compounds. Some examples are given <strong>in</strong><br />
Fig. 32 (see also the article by M.R. Caira <strong>in</strong> this volume).<br />
8<br />
Crystal Surface Recognition and Chirality<br />
The effects of certa<strong>in</strong> impurities on the habit of a grow<strong>in</strong>g crystal provi<strong>de</strong><br />
another directional aspect of <strong>in</strong>termolecular recognition. If an impurity is<br />
similar (but not i<strong>de</strong>ntical) to the molecules on the surface as well as <strong>in</strong> the bulk<br />
of the crystal, it is adsorbed on a specific crystal face. Presumably the surface has<br />
recognized that part of the impurity molecule that most resembles the molecules<br />
compos<strong>in</strong>g the crystal. The impurity, however, presents to the exterior a<br />
si<strong>de</strong> onto which further molecules of host material cannot b<strong>in</strong>d, as diagrammed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Fig. 33. Therefore the growth of that face will be <strong>in</strong>hibited, and will be prom<strong>in</strong>ent<br />
<strong>in</strong> the habit of the result<strong>in</strong>g crystal. For example, benzami<strong>de</strong> forms platelike<br />
elongated crystals. If, however, some benzoic acid is ad<strong>de</strong>d to the solution, the<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g crystals will be elongated along a different direction.<br />
Directional b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of molecules to crystal faces provi<strong>de</strong>s an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
means of controll<strong>in</strong>g crystal habit and resolv<strong>in</strong>g optically active molecules<br />
[85–87]. It provi<strong>de</strong>s food for thought with respect to the <strong>de</strong>sign of agents with<br />
specific recognition requirements. An example is provi<strong>de</strong>d by the crystal structure<br />
of glyc<strong>in</strong>e (which lacks an asymmetric carbon atom). This crystallizes as<br />
bipyramids [86] <strong>in</strong> a monocl<strong>in</strong>ic, centrosymmetric space group. The pack<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
molecules and the prochirality of the C-H groups they present on the surface are<br />
different for the 010 and 01 – 0 faces of the crystal. On addition of resolved am<strong>in</strong>o<br />
acids, pyramidal crystals with a basal face are formed. This is because the pro-R<br />
and pro-S-hydrogen atoms of glyc<strong>in</strong>e can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> the crystal structure<br />
of glyc<strong>in</strong>e, one ly<strong>in</strong>g on the (010) faces and the other on the (01 – 1) faces, as<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 34. Only D-am<strong>in</strong>o acids [(R)-am<strong>in</strong>o acids] can readily replace glyc<strong>in</strong>e<br />
at grow<strong>in</strong>g (010) faces while only L-am<strong>in</strong>o acids [(S)-am<strong>in</strong>o acids] can grow