02.03.2013 Views

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supramolecular Synthons and Pattern Recognition 79<br />

additional C(2)-H◊◊◊O(2) and C(8)-H◊◊◊O(2) <strong>in</strong>teractions forced by the geometry<br />

of the A.T/U base pair (Scheme 12). Moreover, the repulsive secondary<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction between the O(2) atom of T/U and N(1) or N(7) atom of A is now<br />

balanced by a stabilis<strong>in</strong>g hydrogen bond. In recognition motifs where the<br />

C-H◊◊◊O hydrogen bond is a viable contributor, the hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g abilities<br />

of thym<strong>in</strong>e and uracil must be consi<strong>de</strong>red <strong>in</strong> a different light. The sp 2 C-H of<br />

uracil has a greatly enhanced hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g capability compared to the CH 3<br />

hydrogens of thym<strong>in</strong>e because of its higher acidity. It has been shown that the<br />

geometries and energies of DNA base triplets (CG):C, (TA):T, (AT):A and<br />

(GC):G and their match<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the homologous recomb<strong>in</strong>ation can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by the auxiliary C-H◊◊◊O and C-H◊◊◊N hydrogen bonds [58]. It is clear that<br />

C-H◊◊◊O and C-H◊◊◊N hydrogen bonds are abundant <strong>in</strong> biological macromolecules<br />

and <strong>de</strong>spite their small enthalpic contribution (0.5–2.0 kcal mol –1 ) [59],<br />

they seem to exert pronounced structural and functional effects [60].<br />

7.2<br />

Pattern Recognition <strong>in</strong> Drug-Enzyme B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a of recognition between enzyme and substrate goes back more than one<br />

hundred years to Fischer’s “lock-and-key” analogy of enzyme catalysis [61].<br />

Drug-receptor recognition and b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is, however, not as simple as the lockand-key<br />

analogy and may be more likened to a hand fitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a glove. Both the<br />

drug (or ligand) as well as the receptor (or active site) are flexible and yet have<br />

very specific requirements for mutual recognition [62]. It is important to note<br />

that the dock<strong>in</strong>g of a drug molecule <strong>in</strong>to the active site of a receptor prote<strong>in</strong> is<br />

governed by the same comb<strong>in</strong>ation of forces that control crystallisation, namely<br />

electrostatic forces, hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractions, van <strong>de</strong>r Waals forces and<br />

hydrophobic effects, the last factor be<strong>in</strong>g responsible for the exclusion of water<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Scheme 12 a – d. C-H◊◊◊O hydrogen bonds <strong>in</strong>: a Watson-Crick U . A pair; b Hoogsteen T . A pair;<br />

c O8G◊ A pair (O8G: 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguan<strong>in</strong>e); d Hoogsteen C + ◊ G pair. For patterns a, b<br />

and c, see [57]; pattern d is putative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!