02.03.2013 Views

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

198 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board: A. de Meijere KN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supramolecular Synthons and Pattern Recognition 89<br />

not rigorously quantifiable. In this respect, the usage of the synthon concept <strong>in</strong><br />

crystal eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and supramolecular chemistry follows very closely its usage<br />

<strong>in</strong> classical organic synthesis. In both these usages, simplification is comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with chemical focus. Given that crystal structures need to be simplified before<br />

they can be compared and analysed, the graph set notation doubtless offers an<br />

accurate topological <strong>de</strong>scription of hydrogen bon<strong>de</strong>d patterns. However, the<br />

simplification is drastic and is achieved at the cost of obscur<strong>in</strong>g the chemical<br />

nature of the recognition events that are the primary causes of crystallisation.<br />

On balance, synthons appear to offer a middle ground where<strong>in</strong> simplification is<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed without compromis<strong>in</strong>g the chemical <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

supramolecular system [83–90].<br />

A common <strong>de</strong>ficiency of the graph set and synthon approaches to crystal<br />

structure <strong>de</strong>scription is that they represent <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> a crystal without<br />

any <strong>in</strong>dication as to whether they are strong or weak and as to their importance<br />

<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g crystal pack<strong>in</strong>g. Such <strong>in</strong>formation is available <strong>in</strong> a new pictorial<br />

method called NIPMAT (Nonbon<strong>de</strong>d Interaction Pattern MATrix) that is<br />

used to display <strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> crystals [91]. A two-dimensional<br />

quantitative representation gives a s<strong>in</strong>gle-view visualisation of the relative<br />

strengths of the hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g and van <strong>de</strong>r Waals forces operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

crystal. For example, the crystal structures of 2-, 3- and 4-am<strong>in</strong>ophenols <strong>de</strong>tailed<br />

earlier <strong>in</strong> this article may now be compared through their NIPMAT plots<br />

[92]. Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Fig. 10 shows that hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g between the am<strong>in</strong>o<br />

and hydroxy groups is the common, dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teraction as<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nced from the dark grey squares for H6-O1 and H7-N1 <strong>in</strong> the upper right<br />

hand corner of the plot. The contribution from the N-H◊ ◊ ◊p <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong><br />

2- and 3-am<strong>in</strong>ophenols is revealed by the grey squares for H5-C3/4/5 and<br />

H5-C4/5/6 respectively (Figs. 10a, b), whereas this <strong>in</strong>teraction is absent <strong>in</strong><br />

4-am<strong>in</strong>ophenol (Fig. 10c).<br />

a<br />

NIPMAT plot of 2-am<strong>in</strong>ophenol 28<br />

Fig. 10 a – c. Comparison of crystal structures with NIPMAT plots: a 2-am<strong>in</strong>ophenol 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!