05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />

of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce his m<strong>in</strong>d is not active. As he has a material body,<br />

he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [3] A<br />

sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born <strong>in</strong> the world of desire but lacks his faculty. He<br />

does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce he<br />

cannot have the five faculties. As he has a material body he does<br />

not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. 54<br />

This k<strong>in</strong>d of def<strong>in</strong>itional conflict frequently occurs <strong>in</strong> the abhidharma works<br />

<strong>and</strong> it sometimes becomes a k<strong>in</strong>d of driv<strong>in</strong>g force for complex doctr<strong>in</strong>al<br />

development. A similar problem occurs when the support for the mental series<br />

is discussed. Due to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the world of formlessness (ArEpyadhAtu),<br />

body (kAya), which was said to be the support of the mental series<br />

(cittasaNtAna) of liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the world of form, cannot exist <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world of formlessness. On this basis, the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>sisted that the<br />

support of liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the world of formlessness was life faculty<br />

( jCvitendriya), homogeneous character of the group (nikAyasabhAga) <strong>and</strong> similar<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds of dharmas not associated with the m<strong>in</strong>d (cittaviprayuktasaNskAra). 55<br />

We do not know whether the def<strong>in</strong>itional problem was taken seriously<br />

by other Buddhist schools or not, yet this seems to be enough for the<br />

Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas to dismiss the old explanation by the five faculties<br />

<strong>and</strong> to give their total support to the new explanation by the existence<br />

of vitality (Ayu). <strong>The</strong> author of the MahAvibhALAUAstra suggested his own<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion 56 that whether nirvana was with or without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was determ<strong>in</strong>ed solely by the existence of vitality (Ayu):<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an op<strong>in</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> text should be written as follows: what is<br />

nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? <strong>The</strong> complete cessation of all<br />

fetters (saNyojana) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed ( prApta), possessed ( pratilabdha),<br />

touched (spKLMa), <strong>and</strong> realised (sAkLAtkKta) by an arahant while his<br />

vitality (Ayus) alone exists. What is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? An arahant whose vitality has already come to an end<br />

destroys all fetters completely. 57<br />

Although it was not presented as a formal op<strong>in</strong>ion of the Sarvastivada-<br />

Vaibhalikas, it seems to be presented as a solution to the above mentioned<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itional problem. While there still was some trace of the Itivuttaka clarification<br />

left <strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna explanation of the two nirvana theory,<br />

there was no trace left <strong>in</strong> this newly proposed solution.<br />

Despite the above modification, this newly proposed op<strong>in</strong>ion cont<strong>in</strong>ued to<br />

apply such terms as ‘obta<strong>in</strong>ed’ ( prApta) <strong>and</strong> ‘possessed’ ( pratilabdha) only to<br />

nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (sopadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu), as <strong>in</strong> the case<br />

of the JñAnaprasthAna. <strong>The</strong> question arose why these terms were not applied<br />

to nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (nirupadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu). <strong>The</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g two answers were given <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra:<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!