Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />
of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce his m<strong>in</strong>d is not active. As he has a material body,<br />
he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [3] A<br />
sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born <strong>in</strong> the world of desire but lacks his faculty. He<br />
does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce he<br />
cannot have the five faculties. As he has a material body he does<br />
not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. 54<br />
This k<strong>in</strong>d of def<strong>in</strong>itional conflict frequently occurs <strong>in</strong> the abhidharma works<br />
<strong>and</strong> it sometimes becomes a k<strong>in</strong>d of driv<strong>in</strong>g force for complex doctr<strong>in</strong>al<br />
development. A similar problem occurs when the support for the mental series<br />
is discussed. Due to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the world of formlessness (ArEpyadhAtu),<br />
body (kAya), which was said to be the support of the mental series<br />
(cittasaNtAna) of liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the world of form, cannot exist <strong>in</strong> the<br />
world of formlessness. On this basis, the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>sisted that the<br />
support of liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the world of formlessness was life faculty<br />
( jCvitendriya), homogeneous character of the group (nikAyasabhAga) <strong>and</strong> similar<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of dharmas not associated with the m<strong>in</strong>d (cittaviprayuktasaNskAra). 55<br />
We do not know whether the def<strong>in</strong>itional problem was taken seriously<br />
by other Buddhist schools or not, yet this seems to be enough for the<br />
Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas to dismiss the old explanation by the five faculties<br />
<strong>and</strong> to give their total support to the new explanation by the existence<br />
of vitality (Ayu). <strong>The</strong> author of the MahAvibhALAUAstra suggested his own<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ion 56 that whether nirvana was with or without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
was determ<strong>in</strong>ed solely by the existence of vitality (Ayu):<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is an op<strong>in</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> text should be written as follows: what is<br />
nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? <strong>The</strong> complete cessation of all<br />
fetters (saNyojana) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed ( prApta), possessed ( pratilabdha),<br />
touched (spKLMa), <strong>and</strong> realised (sAkLAtkKta) by an arahant while his<br />
vitality (Ayus) alone exists. What is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? An arahant whose vitality has already come to an end<br />
destroys all fetters completely. 57<br />
Although it was not presented as a formal op<strong>in</strong>ion of the Sarvastivada-<br />
Vaibhalikas, it seems to be presented as a solution to the above mentioned<br />
def<strong>in</strong>itional problem. While there still was some trace of the Itivuttaka clarification<br />
left <strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna explanation of the two nirvana theory,<br />
there was no trace left <strong>in</strong> this newly proposed solution.<br />
Despite the above modification, this newly proposed op<strong>in</strong>ion cont<strong>in</strong>ued to<br />
apply such terms as ‘obta<strong>in</strong>ed’ ( prApta) <strong>and</strong> ‘possessed’ ( pratilabdha) only to<br />
nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (sopadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu), as <strong>in</strong> the case<br />
of the JñAnaprasthAna. <strong>The</strong> question arose why these terms were not applied<br />
to nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (nirupadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu). <strong>The</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g two answers were given <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra:<br />
84