05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES<br />

54 <strong>The</strong> defilement is a genitive related to the cessation.<br />

55 SA (TD2 57c8), SN IV p. 109.<br />

56 Once anuUaya, the state of be<strong>in</strong>g seed, was destroyed by the power of <strong>in</strong>tuition<br />

(darUana) <strong>and</strong> the noble path (mArga), name <strong>and</strong> form (nAmarEpa) which is the<br />

support (AUraya) for the anuUaya became special (viUeLa); that is to say, from a<br />

normal state of be<strong>in</strong>g with a power to produce a defilement to a special state of<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g without a power to produce a defilement, Akb-h p. 63, La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong><br />

(1923: 209–10) <strong>and</strong> Cox (1995: 94).<br />

57 SA (TD2 88a9). Cf. AN I p. 100, V p. 421, SN I p. 136.<br />

58 tasmiN sati mArge prApte vA, Sa-w p. 221. Akb-h p. 94 reads differently: .when it[,<br />

noble path,] is at h<strong>and</strong> or atta<strong>in</strong>ed’ (tasmiN eva saNmukhCbhEte prApte vA). <strong>The</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese translation done by Xuan-zang (Akb-x TD29 35a) support the read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of Sa-w.<br />

59 SA (TD2 414a10), SA (TD2 210a20), DN II p. 157, SN I p. 159, Th p. 84.<br />

60 <strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese translation made by Xuan-zang (Akb-x TD29 35a2) reads differently:<br />

‘As the blow<strong>in</strong>g out of a lamp could only be regarded as the ext<strong>in</strong>ction of<br />

a flame without any separate existent (dravyntara), the liberation atta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d of the blessed one could only be the ext<strong>in</strong>ction of all aggregates without<br />

any [separate existent]’; but the Paramartha’s translation (Akb-pm TD29 p. 192c)<br />

confirms the Sanskrit read<strong>in</strong>g. Although such scholars as F. Otto Schrader <strong>and</strong><br />

Peter Harvey have <strong>in</strong>sisted that ‘the blow<strong>in</strong>g out of a lamp’ does not mean<br />

absolute non-existence, Vasub<strong>and</strong>hu’s position on this simile is clearly aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

their op<strong>in</strong>ions (Schrader 1905: 165–9; Harvey 1990: 66–7).<br />

61 Na (TD 29 432c22–433a10/TK 17 20–1).<br />

62 Anuruddha’s stanza <strong>and</strong> one setra <strong>in</strong> the Sanyukta-agama (TD2 88a) quoted by<br />

Vasub<strong>and</strong>hu (Akb-x p. 94) to support his view: nirvana is mere non-existence:<br />

‘That which is entire ab<strong>and</strong>onment, rel<strong>in</strong>quishment, com<strong>in</strong>g to an end, exhaustion,<br />

detachment, cessation, tranquillization, disappearance of [even] the smallest<br />

suffer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> non-connection, non-aris<strong>in</strong>g, non-appearance of other suffer<strong>in</strong>g, that<br />

is lovely, that is excellent – that is to say, ab<strong>and</strong>onment of all conditions, perish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of desire, detachment, cessation, nirvana.’ Cf. AN I p. 100, V p. 421, SN I<br />

p. 136.<br />

63 Both suttas seems to be those <strong>in</strong> the UdAna Ud pp. 80–1) <strong>in</strong> the Pali<br />

KhuddakanikAya that were quoted by modern scholars to <strong>in</strong>sist that nirvana<br />

cannot be mere non-existence. For these suttas, see Coll<strong>in</strong>s (1998: 164–75).<br />

64 In this argument, Sawgabhadra’s position on a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished is very close to<br />

the so-called common Indian suggested by F. Otto Schrader (Schrader 1905:<br />

167): ‘an expir<strong>in</strong>g flame does not really go out, but returns <strong>in</strong>to the primitive,<br />

pure, <strong>in</strong>visible state of fire it had before its appearance as visible fire’. This view<br />

could have been orig<strong>in</strong>ated from the essential character (liWga) <strong>in</strong> the VvetAUvatara<br />

UpAniLad: ‘When a fire is conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> its womb (yoni), one cannot see its<br />

visible form <strong>and</strong> yet its essential character (liWga) is not ext<strong>in</strong>guished; one can<br />

grasp the fire once aga<strong>in</strong> from its womb by means of t<strong>in</strong>der. In just the same way,<br />

one can grasp both with<strong>in</strong> the body by means of the syllable Oq’ (SU I 13, tr.<br />

Olivelle). What is the difference between <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic nature (svabhAva) <strong>and</strong> essential<br />

character (liWga) <strong>in</strong> the image of a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished?<br />

65 A similar position can be found <strong>in</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ravada tradition. <strong>The</strong>y expla<strong>in</strong> nirvana<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g separately (pAMiyekka) as different from the mere cessation of passion,<br />

hatred <strong>and</strong> delusion. <strong>The</strong> Sammohav<strong>in</strong>odanC, the commentary on the VibhaWga,<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>s it as follows: ‘But because passion etc. cease on com<strong>in</strong>g to this [nirvana], it<br />

is said that it is the cessation of passion, the cessation of hatred, <strong>and</strong> the cessation<br />

of delusion’ (Vibh-a p. 51).<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!