Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />
is not of w<strong>in</strong>d or some other agent actively putt<strong>in</strong>g out a fire, but of a fire’s<br />
automatic go<strong>in</strong>g out through lack of fuel. 47 For example, one passage <strong>in</strong> the<br />
MajjhimanikAya reads as follows:<br />
Just as an oil-lamp burns because of oil <strong>and</strong> wick, but when the oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> wick are exhausted, <strong>and</strong> no others are supplied, it goes out<br />
through lack of fuel, so the [enlightened] monk . . . knows that after<br />
the break-up of his body, when further life is exhausted, all feel<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
which are rejoiced <strong>in</strong> here will become cool. 48<br />
It is ‘lack of fuel’ that is the ma<strong>in</strong> cause of the ext<strong>in</strong>ction of a fire <strong>in</strong> this<br />
context. This po<strong>in</strong>t is further confirmed from the simile of a palm uprooted. 49<br />
When a palm is uprooted, it cannot sprout a new trunk to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the<br />
future.<br />
In order not to reappear <strong>in</strong> the future, there should be no more causes<br />
whatsoever to produce a new fire or to sprout a new trunk. Thus, the image<br />
of the ext<strong>in</strong>guished fire <strong>and</strong> of a palm uprooted <strong>in</strong> this context expla<strong>in</strong>s that<br />
it cannot reappear <strong>in</strong> the future ow<strong>in</strong>g to a lack of any cause whatsoever.<br />
In my op<strong>in</strong>ion, this could be the best explanation of how the TathAgata<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ally passes away <strong>and</strong> why he no longer returns to endless rebirths without<br />
admitt<strong>in</strong>g any transcendental state reachable after death. Although the<br />
Buddha was silent <strong>in</strong>stead of reply<strong>in</strong>g to Vacchagotta’s question, his solution<br />
looks as if he is answer<strong>in</strong>g by ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> return, as <strong>in</strong> Phagguna’s case: 50<br />
‘This was not a fit question. I am not say<strong>in</strong>g that the TathAgata exists, does<br />
not exist, does <strong>and</strong> does not exist or neither exists nor does not exist after<br />
death. If I were say<strong>in</strong>g so, the question would be a fit one. But I am not<br />
say<strong>in</strong>g so. Although I am not say<strong>in</strong>g so, however, if you asked me “<strong>The</strong>n,<br />
Blessed one, how does the TathAgata f<strong>in</strong>ally pass away”, this would be a fit<br />
question. And the fit answer to it is . . .’<br />
Earlier <strong>in</strong> this chapter, I showed that there are two ma<strong>in</strong> concerns around<br />
this last issue of the unanswered questions: whether the Buddha accepts a<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> state reachable by an enlightened one after death <strong>and</strong> on what grounds<br />
he wants this question to rema<strong>in</strong> unanswered. For the first matter the Buddha<br />
seems to leave such a state, a k<strong>in</strong>d of absolute, aside, 51 s<strong>in</strong>ce it is outside the<br />
range of his methodology, which expla<strong>in</strong>s th<strong>in</strong>gs through the causal relationship<br />
between phenomenal dharmas. For the second, I could say that his<br />
methodology, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to the cause (yoniso manasikAra), could<br />
help to account for his leav<strong>in</strong>g questions on the state of the TathAgata after<br />
death unanswered.<br />
<strong>The</strong> image of a fire <strong>in</strong> the early Upanis.ads<br />
How does the metaphor of a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished relate to the so-called common<br />
Indian view suggested by F. Otto Schrader above? Could the audience<br />
58