05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES<br />

41 Sap (TD26 415c), Ds (TD26 512c), Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 138a).<br />

42 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 219–21). See also Cox (1995: 107–12).<br />

43 Akb-h p. 258, La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 677).<br />

44 Mv (TD27 99a).<br />

45 Mv (TD27 100a).<br />

46 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 678).<br />

47 Mv (TD27 169a). See this chapter, note 18.<br />

48 It p. 38.<br />

49 Mv (TD27 167c–168a): !"#$%&'(K<br />

50 Mv (TD27 167c): !"#$%&'()K= !"#$K<br />

51 Mv (TD27 168a): !"#$%&'()K= !"#$K<br />

52 It p. 38.<br />

53 Mv (TD27 168b): !"#$ %&'()K= !"#$%K= !<br />

!"#$% K<br />

54 Mv (TD27 168b): !"#$K= !"#$%&'()K= !K=<br />

!"#$K= !"#$%&'(K= !"#$%&'()*K=<br />

!"#$%&'(K= !"#$%&K= !"#$%&'()<br />

K= !"#$%&'()K<br />

55 Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 137a).<br />

56 Later <strong>in</strong> the text, it says ‘<strong>The</strong> author of the treatise (the MahAvibhALAUAstra)<br />

gave this op<strong>in</strong>ion for the sake of all disciples to underst<strong>and</strong> [the two nirvana<br />

theory] easily.’<br />

57 Mv (TD27 168b): K= !"#K= !"#$K= !"#$%<br />

!"#$%&K= !"#$K= !"#$%&'()*K<br />

58 Mv (TD27 168a): !"#"$%K= !"#$%K= !"#$%<br />

!"#K= !"#$%&'!()K= !K<br />

59 Mil p. 27.<br />

60 Lamotte (1988: 606).<br />

61 Mv (TD27 169b).<br />

62 Mv (TD27 168a). See this chapter, note 58.<br />

63 Mv (TD27 168a). See this chapter, note 58.<br />

64 Vs-c (TD43 274a). See Masuda (1925: 67), La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1928: 48), Lamotte<br />

(1936: 19).<br />

65 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />

66 Cox (1995: 37–9). See also ‘<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ravada exegetical position on nirvana’ <strong>in</strong><br />

Chapter 4.<br />

67 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />

68 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />

69 Jp (TD26 p. 923b).<br />

70 Mv (TD27 pp. 167b–168b).<br />

71 See this chapter, note 14.<br />

72 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 219). See this chapter note 16.<br />

73 Sap (TD26 415c), Ds (TD26 512c), Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 138a).<br />

74 Cox (1995: 109).<br />

75 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 220–1).<br />

76 Cox (1995: 109): ‘(1) homogeneous character is not different from the nature of<br />

an ord<strong>in</strong>ary person; (2) s<strong>in</strong>ce homogeneous character has no form <strong>and</strong> cannot<br />

be directly perceived, its activity cannot be known; (3) the homogeneous character<br />

of <strong>in</strong>sentient objects should also be admitted; (4) s<strong>in</strong>ce another homogeneous<br />

character is required to account for the similarity among all varieties of homogeneous<br />

character, <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite regress would result; <strong>and</strong> (5) homogeneous character<br />

is noth<strong>in</strong>g other than the Vaiuelika categories of generality (sAmAnya) or of<br />

particular generalities (sAmAnyaviUeLa).’<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!