Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NOTES<br />
41 Sap (TD26 415c), Ds (TD26 512c), Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 138a).<br />
42 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 219–21). See also Cox (1995: 107–12).<br />
43 Akb-h p. 258, La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 677).<br />
44 Mv (TD27 99a).<br />
45 Mv (TD27 100a).<br />
46 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 678).<br />
47 Mv (TD27 169a). See this chapter, note 18.<br />
48 It p. 38.<br />
49 Mv (TD27 167c–168a): !"#$%&'(K<br />
50 Mv (TD27 167c): !"#$%&'()K= !"#$K<br />
51 Mv (TD27 168a): !"#$%&'()K= !"#$K<br />
52 It p. 38.<br />
53 Mv (TD27 168b): !"#$ %&'()K= !"#$%K= !<br />
!"#$% K<br />
54 Mv (TD27 168b): !"#$K= !"#$%&'()K= !K=<br />
!"#$K= !"#$%&'(K= !"#$%&'()*K=<br />
!"#$%&'(K= !"#$%&K= !"#$%&'()<br />
K= !"#$%&'()K<br />
55 Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 137a).<br />
56 Later <strong>in</strong> the text, it says ‘<strong>The</strong> author of the treatise (the MahAvibhALAUAstra)<br />
gave this op<strong>in</strong>ion for the sake of all disciples to underst<strong>and</strong> [the two nirvana<br />
theory] easily.’<br />
57 Mv (TD27 168b): K= !"#K= !"#$K= !"#$%<br />
!"#$%&K= !"#$K= !"#$%&'()*K<br />
58 Mv (TD27 168a): !"#"$%K= !"#$%K= !"#$%<br />
!"#K= !"#$%&'!()K= !K<br />
59 Mil p. 27.<br />
60 Lamotte (1988: 606).<br />
61 Mv (TD27 169b).<br />
62 Mv (TD27 168a). See this chapter, note 58.<br />
63 Mv (TD27 168a). See this chapter, note 58.<br />
64 Vs-c (TD43 274a). See Masuda (1925: 67), La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1928: 48), Lamotte<br />
(1936: 19).<br />
65 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />
66 Cox (1995: 37–9). See also ‘<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ravada exegetical position on nirvana’ <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter 4.<br />
67 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />
68 Cox (1995: 40–1).<br />
69 Jp (TD26 p. 923b).<br />
70 Mv (TD27 pp. 167b–168b).<br />
71 See this chapter, note 14.<br />
72 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 219). See this chapter note 16.<br />
73 Sap (TD26 415c), Ds (TD26 512c), Jp (TD26 921c), Mv (TD27 138a).<br />
74 Cox (1995: 109).<br />
75 La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong> (1923: 220–1).<br />
76 Cox (1995: 109): ‘(1) homogeneous character is not different from the nature of<br />
an ord<strong>in</strong>ary person; (2) s<strong>in</strong>ce homogeneous character has no form <strong>and</strong> cannot<br />
be directly perceived, its activity cannot be known; (3) the homogeneous character<br />
of <strong>in</strong>sentient objects should also be admitted; (4) s<strong>in</strong>ce another homogeneous<br />
character is required to account for the similarity among all varieties of homogeneous<br />
character, <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite regress would result; <strong>and</strong> (5) homogeneous character<br />
is noth<strong>in</strong>g other than the Vaiuelika categories of generality (sAmAnya) or of<br />
particular generalities (sAmAnyaviUeLa).’<br />
144