Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NIRVANA IN NORTHERN BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>e which argument represents the orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g of the image of a<br />
fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> the context of the TathAgata after death. 169 As seen<br />
before, the image represents a fire’s go<strong>in</strong>g out due to lack of fuel <strong>and</strong> is<br />
different from a fire image seen <strong>in</strong> the early UpaniLads. <strong>The</strong> latter predicates<br />
that when a phenomenal fire is ext<strong>in</strong>guished, the essential character (liWga)<br />
of fire is not ext<strong>in</strong>guished but hidden <strong>in</strong> its latent state, 170 which could be the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> of the so-called Indian view suggested by F. Otto Schrader. 171<br />
<strong>The</strong> second argument put forward by Sawghabhadra seems to be based<br />
more on the UpaniLadic image of a fire than on the image of a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished<br />
<strong>in</strong> the context of the TathAgata after death. Although the Buddha<br />
seems to have argued precisely aga<strong>in</strong>st this k<strong>in</strong>d of UpaniLadic view <strong>in</strong> his<br />
dialogue with Vacchagotta, 172 its <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>Buddhism</strong> is apparent from<br />
the position taken by Sawghabhadra’s second argument. By contrast, the<br />
Sautrantika argument expla<strong>in</strong>ed by Xuan-zang 173 specifically represents<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g of the image of a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> the context of<br />
the TathAgata after death. 174 When he says that the fire goes out through<br />
lack of fuel, fuel refers to the five aggregates, as is clearly po<strong>in</strong>ted out by his<br />
say<strong>in</strong>g ‘the liberation atta<strong>in</strong>ed by the m<strong>in</strong>d of the blessed one is only the<br />
ext<strong>in</strong>ction of all aggregates’.<br />
What is the position taken by the <strong>The</strong>ravada exegetical tradition on this<br />
simile? 175 Although its <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terpretation of Anuruddha’s stanza seen <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>The</strong>ragAthAaMMhakathA 176 confirms that the fire goes out through lack of<br />
fuel, its quotation of the PArAyaOa stanza at the end of the clarification<br />
seems to suggest want<strong>in</strong>g to keep open the possibility of <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g nirvana<br />
not as mere non-existence. As seen <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4, nirvana for the later<br />
<strong>The</strong>ravada exegetical tradition is cessation consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> non-aris<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong><br />
exists separately (pAMiyekka) from the mere destruction of passion, hatred<br />
<strong>and</strong> delusion. 177 <strong>The</strong> Sammohav<strong>in</strong>odanC, the commentary on the VibhaWga,<br />
summarises this later position of the <strong>The</strong>ravad<strong>in</strong>s as follows:<br />
And when it is said <strong>in</strong> the exposition of the mental sphere, ‘What is<br />
here the unconditioned element? It is the cessation of passion, the<br />
cessation of hatred, <strong>and</strong> the cessation of delusion’; this means that<br />
the unconditioned element is nirvana whose <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic nature is<br />
unconditioned. But because passion etc. cease on com<strong>in</strong>g to this<br />
[nirvana], it is said, ‘It is the cessation of passion, the cessation of<br />
hatred, <strong>and</strong> the cessation of delusion.’ This is the teachers’ common<br />
explanation of this matter. 178<br />
What has been said here is that the cessation of passion, hatred <strong>and</strong> delusion<br />
is only a phenomenon that appears on the atta<strong>in</strong>ment of nirvana, which<br />
itself exists separately ( pAMiyekka) from this mere destruction.<br />
As seen before, they quote the unidentified sutta to support this position:<br />
‘thus ignorance <strong>and</strong> crav<strong>in</strong>g, on com<strong>in</strong>g to this, are destroyed <strong>in</strong> this, are<br />
103