Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />
Unlike the passage <strong>in</strong> the VvetAUvatara UpaniLad <strong>in</strong> which the idea of the<br />
imperishable character beh<strong>in</strong>d a phenomenal fire is expressed, this passage<br />
seems to focus on the creation of a fire, as the whole passage is deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
Brahman’s super-creation. In fact, the production of fire by this fire-drill<br />
method has sexual connotations: the depression on the slab is often compared<br />
to a vag<strong>in</strong>a, or a womb, <strong>and</strong> the churn<strong>in</strong>g stick to a penis. Although<br />
this reciter’s demonstration of the fire-drill began to be used as a metaphor<br />
<strong>in</strong> the BKhadAraOyaka UpaniLad, there seems to be no idea of an eternal<br />
character beh<strong>in</strong>d a phenomenal fire at this stage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> notion of the imperishable essential character beh<strong>in</strong>d a phenomenal<br />
fire seems to be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the notion of a self (Atman), which is allpervad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> our body. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is the ma<strong>in</strong> message of the<br />
UpaniLads, the relationship between the phenomenal body <strong>and</strong> the self is<br />
expressed through various images, such as salt <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>e. Later <strong>in</strong> the<br />
VvetAUvatara UpaniLad, fire <strong>in</strong> fire-drills was compared to oil <strong>in</strong> sesame seeds,<br />
butter <strong>in</strong> curds <strong>and</strong> water <strong>in</strong> a river-bed, 59 all of which are used to expla<strong>in</strong><br />
the self (Atman) beh<strong>in</strong>d phenomena.<br />
In my op<strong>in</strong>ion, the Buddha probably knew this notion of a self (Atman)<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d the UpaniLadic image of a fire ext<strong>in</strong>guished. S<strong>in</strong>ce accept<strong>in</strong>g self was<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st one of the basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of his thought, the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of no-self<br />
(anAtman), the Buddha perhaps was precisely argu<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st this k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />
view by us<strong>in</strong>g it slightly differently.<br />
By reply<strong>in</strong>g to Vacchagotta’s question, ‘This fire that has gone out <strong>in</strong><br />
front of you, <strong>in</strong> which direction – to the east, west, north or south – has it<br />
gone from here?’, not only did the Buddha ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> his own way of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to the cause (yoniso manasikAra), but he also reacted<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st this notion to show how irrelevant this view was. Assum<strong>in</strong>g a state<br />
like a soul is outside the range of his methodology <strong>and</strong> the best th<strong>in</strong>g we can<br />
do is just leave it aside.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ravada exegetical position on nirvana<br />
We have seen that the fire image when used for nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />
of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g was a fire’s go<strong>in</strong>g out through lack of fuel. Although most suttas<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> this f<strong>in</strong>al stage <strong>in</strong> this way, 60 there is one sutta <strong>in</strong> the PArAyanavagga<br />
<strong>in</strong> the SuttanipAta that expla<strong>in</strong>s the ext<strong>in</strong>ction of a fire <strong>in</strong> a different way.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no Ch<strong>in</strong>ese equivalent of this text, yet its antiquity cannot be doubted.<br />
Not only is it mentioned <strong>in</strong> the V<strong>in</strong>aya 61 but more than half the suttas <strong>in</strong> this<br />
text also have correspondents <strong>in</strong> Sanskrit <strong>and</strong> Prakrit. 62 <strong>The</strong> PArAyanavagga<br />
seems to have been known among Buddhists <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> India not as one<br />
of the traditional sEtras, but as one of the collections of chanted verses.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lamotte, ‘there are clearly ancient compositions of considerable<br />
poetic value which use stanzas as a means of expression. <strong>The</strong> Buddha<br />
was not responsible for compos<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>and</strong> they do not develop the<br />
60