Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANNOTATED TRANSLATIONS OF THE RELATED TEXTS<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g an effort concern<strong>in</strong>g what has already ceased <strong>and</strong> what is on the<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t of ceas<strong>in</strong>g. 47<br />
* * *<br />
[Vaibhalikas] While the blessed one said ‘some dharmas are conditioned <strong>and</strong><br />
some unconditioned, detachment is called the best of them’, 48 if unconditioned<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs simply do not exist, how can there be a non-existence best of<br />
non-existent th<strong>in</strong>gs?<br />
[Sautrantikas] We do not say that ‘the unconditioned does not exist at all’.<br />
This is, however, such a th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the way we said. For example, it is said that<br />
‘there is prior non-existence of sound’ <strong>and</strong> ‘there is non-existence after its<br />
occurrence’.<br />
Moreover, the existence of the non-existence is not proved. <strong>The</strong> unconditioned<br />
should also be seen <strong>in</strong> that way. And a certa<strong>in</strong> non-existence becomes<br />
the most commendable th<strong>in</strong>g; that is to say, the absolute non-existence of all<br />
trouble. It should receive praise as the highest th<strong>in</strong>g of all <strong>in</strong> order to enamour<br />
tra<strong>in</strong>ees of it.<br />
[Vaibhalikas] If unconditioned th<strong>in</strong>gs were mere non-existence, [the third<br />
noble truth of ] cessation would not be a noble truth. 49 For are you say<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that that [truth] is noth<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
[Sautrantikas] What is, then, the mean<strong>in</strong>g of truth? Surely mean<strong>in</strong>g what is<br />
not contradicted. 50 And both these uncontradicted th<strong>in</strong>gs have been seen by<br />
the noble ones that suffer<strong>in</strong>g is suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> that the non-existence of suffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is non-existence. How does this contradict the fact that these are<br />
noble truths?<br />
[Vaibhalikas] How could someth<strong>in</strong>g be called both non-existence <strong>and</strong> the<br />
third noble truth?<br />
[Sautrantikas] It is said that it was seen <strong>and</strong> taught immediately after the<br />
second, so it becomes the third.<br />
[Vaibhalikas] If unconditioned th<strong>in</strong>g is mere non-existence, the consciousness<br />
that has space or nirvana as its object would have non-existence as its<br />
object.<br />
[Sautrantikas] We will be concerned with this when we are deal<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />
existence of past <strong>and</strong> future. 51<br />
[Vaibhalikas] But if when is unconditioned were considered as a real existent<br />
(dravya), what would happen?<br />
[Sautrantikas] Well, what would happen?<br />
122