05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE TWO NIRVANA THEORY IN THE EARLY CANON<br />

a rema<strong>in</strong>der of upAdi, <strong>in</strong> spite of its later currency (see La Vallée Pouss<strong>in</strong>,<br />

1925: 171–77, 179–80), was <strong>in</strong>itially no more than an attempt to f<strong>in</strong>d a middle<br />

course between the orig<strong>in</strong>al idea of Nirvaoa <strong>in</strong> this life <strong>and</strong> the later tendency<br />

to place Nirvaoa after death’. 63 However, the reason why <strong>Buddhism</strong> focuses<br />

more on nirvana dur<strong>in</strong>g life, saupAdisesa nibbAnadhAtu, seems to be that it<br />

automatically leads to f<strong>in</strong>al liberation, anupAdisesa nibbAnadhAtu, from the<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> of rebirth.<br />

Unlike Ja<strong>in</strong>ism, <strong>in</strong> which all action must bear fruit, only <strong>in</strong>tentional action<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Buddhist system can eventually lead to a future result. <strong>The</strong> famous<br />

statement <strong>in</strong> the AWguttaranikAya makes this po<strong>in</strong>t: ‘It is <strong>in</strong>tention (cetanA),<br />

O monks, that I call karma. Hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tended, one does karma through body,<br />

speech, <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.’ 64 S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> their view all action will eventually produce a<br />

result, Ja<strong>in</strong>s try not to do any act even just before death. That is why a voluntary<br />

starvation to death is the best possible way to liberation <strong>in</strong> Ja<strong>in</strong>ism, 65<br />

<strong>and</strong> this is actually said to be how Mahavcra died. So Ja<strong>in</strong>ism focuses more<br />

on what a Buddhist would call the f<strong>in</strong>al nirvana, anupAdisesa nibbAnadhAtu.<br />

By contrast, s<strong>in</strong>ce only <strong>in</strong>tentional action will eventually produce a<br />

result, if a Buddhist monk has achieved firm control over his m<strong>in</strong>d, so that<br />

all defilements have ceased <strong>and</strong> no further defilements will be produced,<br />

his f<strong>in</strong>al liberation, anupAdisesa nibbAnadhAtu, is already confirmed at this<br />

stage, saupAdisesa nibbAnadhAtu. This is why one who atta<strong>in</strong>s saupAdisesa<br />

nibbAnadhAtu is called a sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant), literally ‘one who deserves praise’,<br />

which <strong>in</strong> Ja<strong>in</strong>ism is only applied to the revealers of the religion <strong>and</strong> is used<br />

synonymously with Bhagavat, J<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> TCrthaOkara. 66 In other words, <strong>in</strong><br />

early <strong>Buddhism</strong> the focus is more on nirvana <strong>in</strong> this life.<br />

UpAdisesa with<strong>in</strong> the context of the four noble persons<br />

In the early canon, the word sa-upAdisesa is sometimes used to describe the<br />

first three stages of the four noble persons (ariyapuggala): a stream-enterer<br />

(sotApanna), a once-returner (sakadAgAm<strong>in</strong>), a non-returner (anAgAm<strong>in</strong>) <strong>and</strong><br />

a sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant). 67<br />

In the SaupAdisesasutta <strong>in</strong> the AWguttaranikAya, the word saupAdisesa is used<br />

by the blessed one to describe n<strong>in</strong>e noble persons: five sub-divisions of nonreturner,<br />

antarApar<strong>in</strong>ibbAy<strong>in</strong>, upahaccapar<strong>in</strong>ibbAy<strong>in</strong>, asaWkhArapar<strong>in</strong>ibbAy<strong>in</strong>,<br />

sasaWkhArapar<strong>in</strong>ibbAy<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> akaniMMhagAm<strong>in</strong>; a once-returner (sakadAgAm<strong>in</strong>);<br />

<strong>and</strong> three k<strong>in</strong>ds of stream-enterer (sotApanna), ekabCj<strong>in</strong>, kolaWkola <strong>and</strong><br />

sattakkhattuparama. 68<br />

In the Tissasutta <strong>in</strong> the AWguttaranikAya, two k<strong>in</strong>ds of arahant,<br />

ubhatobhAgavimutta <strong>and</strong> paññAvimutta, are described as anupAdisesa; while<br />

kAyasakkh<strong>in</strong>, diMMhipatta, saddhAvimutta, dhammAnusAr<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> animittavihAr<strong>in</strong><br />

are described as saupAdisesa. 69 While the four noble persons <strong>and</strong> their subcategories<br />

70 are listed <strong>in</strong> the SaupAdisesasutta, the seven noble persons 71 are<br />

listed <strong>in</strong> the Tissasutta.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!