Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />
abolished <strong>in</strong> this, nor do they do anyth<strong>in</strong>g anywhere’. 179 <strong>The</strong> use of the<br />
locative case <strong>in</strong> this quoted sutta could be closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to that of the<br />
Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas seen above. <strong>The</strong>y use the locative case to expla<strong>in</strong><br />
that nirvana, or non-appearance, exists separately from the cessation of<br />
defilements, which was likened to the go<strong>in</strong>g out of a lamp <strong>in</strong> the Anuruddha’s<br />
stanza.<br />
Although it is slightly different, a similar <strong>in</strong>terpretation is found <strong>in</strong> the last<br />
counterargument put forward by Sawghabhadra <strong>in</strong> the NyAyAnusAraUAstra.<br />
In this counterargument, he said: ‘This sEtra 180 only represents the moment of<br />
enter<strong>in</strong>g nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (nirupadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu)’.<br />
181 That is to say, he regarded this f<strong>in</strong>al ext<strong>in</strong>ction that was likened to<br />
the go<strong>in</strong>g out of a lamp as a phenomenon that appears only at the moment<br />
of the f<strong>in</strong>al liberation, whereas nirvana itself is a real existent separate from<br />
this phenomenon.<br />
One th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common <strong>in</strong> both approaches that refuse to see nirvana as<br />
mere non-existence is that such mere destruction is only a phenomenon<br />
appear<strong>in</strong>g at the moment of atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nirvana. <strong>The</strong>ir concept of nirvana,<br />
however, is quite different: for <strong>in</strong>stance, nirvana for the <strong>The</strong>ravad<strong>in</strong>s is the<br />
one <strong>and</strong> only unconditioned, 182 while for the Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas there<br />
are as many nirvanas as there are possible connections to impure dharmas. 183<br />
Table 5.4 shows briefly the developments of the nirvana concept <strong>and</strong> the<br />
two nirvana theory <strong>in</strong> terms of the differences between schools seen so far.<br />
104