Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NIRVANA IN NORTHERN BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />
5<br />
NIRVANA IN NORTHERN<br />
BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />
In the previous chapter, we saw that the nirvana concept found <strong>in</strong> the later<br />
<strong>The</strong>ravada exegeses was of cessation consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> non-aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
separately (pAMiyekka) from the mere destruction of passion, hatred <strong>and</strong><br />
delusion. Apart from numbers, their concept seems to come close to that of<br />
the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s that had been established from their unique position:<br />
<strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on the existence of all dharmas <strong>in</strong> the three time periods while<br />
accept<strong>in</strong>g the momentar<strong>in</strong>ess of conditioned dharmas. 1 As seen briefly <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter 3, under ‘<strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese abhidharma works’, their equivalent of nirvana<br />
was called ext<strong>in</strong>ction through knowledge (pratisaNkhyAnirodha), which was<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle perpetual separation of an impure dharma from a series of aggregates<br />
through the antidote, ‘acquisition of disjunction’ (visaNyogaprApti).<br />
This positive <strong>in</strong>terpretation of nirvana could not satisfy the Sautrantikas<br />
because nirvana for them was not a real existent but a mere designation<br />
(prajñaptisat) 2 <strong>and</strong> was non-existence succeed<strong>in</strong>g existence (paUcAdabhAva). 3<br />
Because the Sautrantikas were critics of the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s, how to <strong>in</strong>terpret<br />
nirvana became a subject of a debate between them. We can see such a<br />
debate <strong>in</strong> the AbhidharmakoUabhALya, 4 <strong>in</strong> the NyAyAnusAraUAstra 5 <strong>and</strong> even<br />
<strong>in</strong> the PrasannapadA, the commentary on MElamadhyamakakArikA. 6 <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />
of Anuruddha’s simile mentioned <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4 seems to be at the<br />
centre of the disputes <strong>in</strong> all three treatises.<br />
In this chapter, I discuss ontological issues of nirvana, especially between<br />
the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the Sautrantikas, by explor<strong>in</strong>g the later development<br />
of the two nirvana theory seen <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra, by check<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Sautrantika’s concept of nirvana that appears <strong>in</strong> the AbhidharmakoUabhALya<br />
<strong>and</strong> by deal<strong>in</strong>g with ontological issues surround<strong>in</strong>g Anuruddha’s simile <strong>in</strong><br />
the above mentioned three treatises.<br />
<strong>The</strong> development of the two nirvana theory<br />
<strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the MahAvibhALAUAstra, one of the reasons why nirvana with<br />
<strong>and</strong> without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g was expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna<br />
77