05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NIRVANA IN NORTHERN BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />

5<br />

NIRVANA IN NORTHERN<br />

BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />

In the previous chapter, we saw that the nirvana concept found <strong>in</strong> the later<br />

<strong>The</strong>ravada exegeses was of cessation consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> non-aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

separately (pAMiyekka) from the mere destruction of passion, hatred <strong>and</strong><br />

delusion. Apart from numbers, their concept seems to come close to that of<br />

the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s that had been established from their unique position:<br />

<strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on the existence of all dharmas <strong>in</strong> the three time periods while<br />

accept<strong>in</strong>g the momentar<strong>in</strong>ess of conditioned dharmas. 1 As seen briefly <strong>in</strong><br />

Chapter 3, under ‘<strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese abhidharma works’, their equivalent of nirvana<br />

was called ext<strong>in</strong>ction through knowledge (pratisaNkhyAnirodha), which was<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle perpetual separation of an impure dharma from a series of aggregates<br />

through the antidote, ‘acquisition of disjunction’ (visaNyogaprApti).<br />

This positive <strong>in</strong>terpretation of nirvana could not satisfy the Sautrantikas<br />

because nirvana for them was not a real existent but a mere designation<br />

(prajñaptisat) 2 <strong>and</strong> was non-existence succeed<strong>in</strong>g existence (paUcAdabhAva). 3<br />

Because the Sautrantikas were critics of the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s, how to <strong>in</strong>terpret<br />

nirvana became a subject of a debate between them. We can see such a<br />

debate <strong>in</strong> the AbhidharmakoUabhALya, 4 <strong>in</strong> the NyAyAnusAraUAstra 5 <strong>and</strong> even<br />

<strong>in</strong> the PrasannapadA, the commentary on MElamadhyamakakArikA. 6 <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

of Anuruddha’s simile mentioned <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4 seems to be at the<br />

centre of the disputes <strong>in</strong> all three treatises.<br />

In this chapter, I discuss ontological issues of nirvana, especially between<br />

the Sarvastivad<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the Sautrantikas, by explor<strong>in</strong>g the later development<br />

of the two nirvana theory seen <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra, by check<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Sautrantika’s concept of nirvana that appears <strong>in</strong> the AbhidharmakoUabhALya<br />

<strong>and</strong> by deal<strong>in</strong>g with ontological issues surround<strong>in</strong>g Anuruddha’s simile <strong>in</strong><br />

the above mentioned three treatises.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of the two nirvana theory<br />

<strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the MahAvibhALAUAstra, one of the reasons why nirvana with<br />

<strong>and</strong> without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g was expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!