05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SELECTED SOURCES FOR THE NIRVANA CONCEPT<br />

without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (nir/an-upadhiUeLa). 19 <strong>The</strong> author [of the<br />

JñAnaprasthAna] here wants to establish the difference between the two.<br />

Alternatively, it is to refute other systems’ op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>and</strong> to establish the<br />

correct theory. That is to say, [1] some say wrongly that nirvana with a<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g should be regarded as a real existent while nirvana<br />

without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g should not. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

<strong>and</strong> makes clear that both nirvana elements should be regarded as a real<br />

existent. [2] Some say wrongly that the first is impure while the second is<br />

pure. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana<br />

elements are pure. [3] Some say wrongly that the first is a conditioned th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

while the second is an unconditioned th<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

<strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana elements are unconditioned th<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

[4] Some say wrongly that the first is good while the second is <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana elements<br />

are <strong>in</strong> nature good. [5] Some say wrongly that the first is the path (mArga)<br />

while the second is the result of the path. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

<strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana elements are the result of the path.<br />

[6] Some say wrongly that the first is the result of the path while the second<br />

is not. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana<br />

elements are the result of the path. [7] Some say wrongly that the first is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the noble truths (satyasaNgKhCta) while the second is not. <strong>The</strong><br />

author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana elements<br />

are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the noble truths. [8] Some say wrongly that the first is aUaikLa<br />

while the second is naivaUaikLanAUaikLa. <strong>The</strong> author refutes this op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

<strong>and</strong> makes it clear that both nirvana elements are naivaUaikLanAUaikLa. For<br />

every reason mentioned above, the author [of the JñAnaprasthAna] made this<br />

discourse.<br />

Nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

What is nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g (sopadhiUeLanirvAOadhAtu)? A<br />

sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant) has completely ext<strong>in</strong>guished his impurity (kLCOAsrava); his<br />

vitality (Ayus) alone exists; the series of primary elements (mahAbhEtAni)<br />

<strong>and</strong> secondary matter (upAdAyarEpa) have not yet become ext<strong>in</strong>ct; the mental<br />

series supported by the five faculties is active as there is still a rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />

of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> complete cessation of all fetters (saNyojana) which is<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed (prApta), possessed (pratilabdha), touched (spKLMa), <strong>and</strong> realised<br />

(sAkLAtkKta) [by this Arahant] is what is called nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. 20<br />

When say<strong>in</strong>g vitality, the life faculty ( jCvitendriya) 21 is meant here.<br />

Question: Why is the homogeneous character of the group (nikAyasabhAga) 22<br />

not mentioned?<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!