Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE DOCTRINAL DEVELOPMENT OF NIRVANA<br />
Table 2.1 Five aggregates <strong>and</strong> cognitive process<br />
Five<br />
aggregates<br />
Cognitive process<br />
<strong>in</strong>driya<br />
rEpa<br />
viLaya<br />
vedanA<br />
[sparUa]<br />
=<br />
vedanA<br />
saNjñA com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
together of<br />
saNjñA<br />
saNskAra three<br />
cetanA<br />
vijñAna vijñAna<br />
Note: This table is based on typical passages <strong>in</strong> SA (TD2: 71c9; TD2: 87c–88a).<br />
In Sue Hamilton’s book Early <strong>Buddhism</strong>: A New Approach the human<br />
cognitive process <strong>in</strong> terms of the five aggregates is mentioned <strong>in</strong> this context.<br />
She underst<strong>and</strong>s rEpa <strong>in</strong> the sense of both the liv<strong>in</strong>g locus of subjectivity<br />
<strong>and</strong> the sense organs, vedanA <strong>in</strong> the sense of the <strong>in</strong>itial feel<strong>in</strong>g of awareness,<br />
saNjñA <strong>in</strong> the sense of be<strong>in</strong>g the process of identify<strong>in</strong>g what that <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
feel<strong>in</strong>g of awareness is <strong>and</strong> vijñAna <strong>in</strong> the sense of cognis<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g. 60<br />
Later she expla<strong>in</strong>s saNskAra <strong>in</strong> the cognitive process as one’s affective<br />
response to whatever one is experienc<strong>in</strong>g. 61 <strong>The</strong>se volitional activities correspond<br />
to volition (cetanA ) seen <strong>in</strong> the above Ch<strong>in</strong>ese passage expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the human cognitive process. Table 2.1 shows how this cognitive process is<br />
related to the five aggregates.<br />
<strong>The</strong> significance of no-self (anAtman) <strong>in</strong> terms of the cognitive theory could<br />
be that there is no need for a self (Atman), the subject of cognition, beh<strong>in</strong>d the<br />
five aggregates to expla<strong>in</strong> the cognitive process. In other words, our cognitive<br />
process could be represented through the collective operation of the five<br />
aggregates <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> this respect, the Itivuttaka’s description of saupAdisesa<br />
nibbAnadhAtu seems to keep the objective sense of the word upAdi.<br />
Nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g is expla<strong>in</strong>ed here as ‘for him, O<br />
monks, all feel<strong>in</strong>gs (vedanA) <strong>in</strong> which he takes no delight will become cool<br />
right here’. This clearly shows that there is no more cognitive process go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on at this stage, the f<strong>in</strong>al moment of the sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant). That is to say, the<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g aggregates are f<strong>in</strong>ally ext<strong>in</strong>guished.<br />
Peter Masefield has argued <strong>in</strong> his paper ‘<strong>The</strong> nibbana-par<strong>in</strong>ibbana controversy’<br />
that the idea ‘that the Buddha taught dhamma merely for the sake<br />
of what must now be seen as some lesser, or at least <strong>in</strong>termediate, goal<br />
would seem somewhat out of keep<strong>in</strong>g with the teach<strong>in</strong>gs of the Nikayas’. 62<br />
Bronkhorst has also argued <strong>in</strong> his book <strong>The</strong> Two Traditions of Meditation<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ancient India that ‘the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between Nirvaoa with <strong>and</strong> without<br />
22