Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NIRVANA IN NORTHERN BUDDHIST SCHOOLS<br />
What was the Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas’ <strong>in</strong>terpretation for ‘with a<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g’ (saupadhiUeLa)? While it was vitality (Ayu) alone <strong>in</strong> the<br />
JñAnaprasthAna, 14 it was both life faculty 15 (jCvitendriya) <strong>and</strong> homogeneous<br />
character of the group (nikAyasabhAga) 16 <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra: 17<br />
When say<strong>in</strong>g vitality, the life faculty ( jCvitendriya) is meant here.<br />
Question: why is homogeneous character of the group<br />
(nikAyasabhAga) not mentioned [<strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna]? Answer:<br />
the author <strong>in</strong>tended to do so <strong>and</strong> so on. Alternatively, it is not<br />
mentioned as that mean<strong>in</strong>g is surely understood from the word with<br />
a rema<strong>in</strong>der (sa-UeLa). Alternatively, both the life faculty <strong>and</strong> homogeneous<br />
character of the group are the result of action that projects<br />
existence (AkLepakakarman). 18 As the vital organ is exclusively maturation<br />
(vipAka), it 19 is mentioned alone here [<strong>in</strong> the JñAnaprasthAna].<br />
One of the obvious steps forward for the Sarvastivada abhidharmic systematisation<br />
was to <strong>in</strong>terpret vitality (Ayu) as life faculty ( jCvitendriya), s<strong>in</strong>ce it<br />
was def<strong>in</strong>ed as ‘vitality (Ayu) of the three spheres of existence’ <strong>in</strong> the<br />
AbhidharmakoUabhALya. 20 This <strong>in</strong>terpretation could not be an isolated phenomenon<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the Sarvastivada-Vaibhalikas <strong>in</strong> Northern India, s<strong>in</strong>ce life<br />
faculty was appeared <strong>in</strong> the context of the two nirvana theory <strong>in</strong> the Pali<br />
PeMakopadesa, which is said to date from around first century ce somewhere<br />
<strong>in</strong> South India. 21 However, add<strong>in</strong>g homogeneous character of the group<br />
(nikAyasabhAga) along with life faculty may have been an isolated phenomenon<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the Sarvastivada-Vaibhalika tradition, <strong>and</strong> this seems to show<br />
some characteristics of their abhidharmic systematisation.<br />
Apart from the def<strong>in</strong>ition given above, life faculty ( jCvitendriya) was said,<br />
like vitality (Ayu), to support warmth (usmA) <strong>and</strong> consciousness (vijñAna)<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the AbhidharmakoUabhALya. 22 This function seems to have orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
directly from the PheOasutta stanza 23 together with the dialogue between<br />
Mahakommhita <strong>and</strong> Sariputta <strong>in</strong> the MahAvedallasutta <strong>in</strong> the MajjhimanikAya 24<br />
mentioned <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3. 25 In this dialogue, vitality was said not only to be<br />
<strong>in</strong>terdependent with warmth but also to stabilise the five faculties. This role<br />
of support<strong>in</strong>g the five faculties (<strong>in</strong>driya) <strong>in</strong> the early canon seems to <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
the later expansion of the life faculty’s function <strong>in</strong> the MahAvibhALAUAstra.<br />
Life faculty ( jCvit<strong>in</strong>driya) first appeared <strong>in</strong> the Pali sutta grouped with two<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g faculties of mascul<strong>in</strong>ity (puris<strong>in</strong>driya) <strong>and</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ity (itth<strong>in</strong>driya). 26<br />
<strong>The</strong>se three are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the well known set of twenty-two controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
faculties <strong>in</strong> both Northern <strong>and</strong> Southern Buddhist traditions. 27 With<strong>in</strong> early<br />
sEtras <strong>in</strong> the Northern tradition, the character <strong>and</strong> function of life faculty<br />
( jCvit<strong>in</strong>driya) is not clearly expla<strong>in</strong>ed, while its reference to death <strong>and</strong> the<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ation of a given life was frequently noticed. 28 This situation was hardly<br />
changed when the life faculty ( jCvit<strong>in</strong>driya) was listed <strong>and</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>ed as one<br />
79