Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANNOTATED TRANSLATIONS OF THE RELATED TEXTS<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on’ is conventionally designated ( prajñapti) <strong>in</strong> respect of a person<br />
(pudgala). <strong>The</strong>re is no person but dharma <strong>in</strong> itself (dharmatA) <strong>in</strong> [nirvana<br />
without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g]; 34 it is not mentioned here.<br />
Discussions of the two nirvana theory<br />
Question: Can anyone admit that a sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant) resides neither <strong>in</strong><br />
nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g nor <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? 35<br />
Answer: It is impossible by reason<strong>in</strong>g, yet it is possible from the def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
given here. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to them, it is nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g when<br />
all three th<strong>in</strong>gs are present, whereas it is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g when one of three th<strong>in</strong>gs is not present. [1] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born<br />
<strong>in</strong> the world of formlessness, he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />
of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce he cannot have a material body. As his m<strong>in</strong>d is active, he<br />
does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [2] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t<br />
who is born <strong>in</strong> the world of form <strong>and</strong> has entered the absorption of ext<strong>in</strong>ction<br />
(nirodhasamApatti), he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce his m<strong>in</strong>d is not active. As there is a material body, he does not<br />
reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [3] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born<br />
<strong>in</strong> the world of desire but lacks his faculty, he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana<br />
with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce he cannot have the five faculties. As he<br />
has a material body he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is an op<strong>in</strong>ion. 36 <strong>The</strong> text should be written as follows: what is<br />
nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? <strong>The</strong> complete cessation of all fetters<br />
(saNyojana) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed ( prApta), possessed ( pratilabdha), touched (spKLMa)<br />
<strong>and</strong> realised (sAkLAtkKta) by a sa<strong>in</strong>t while his vitality (Ayus) alone exists.<br />
What is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? A sa<strong>in</strong>t whose vitality has<br />
already come to an end ceases all fetters completely.<br />
In this way, when a sa<strong>in</strong>t is born <strong>in</strong> one of three worlds, whether he has a<br />
material body or not, whether his m<strong>in</strong>d is active or not, whether he has the<br />
five faculties or not, he resides <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g if his<br />
vitality exists. He resides <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g if his<br />
vitality has come to an end. Although it should be written <strong>in</strong> this way, it is<br />
not written. That is why the author of this treatise 37 gave this op<strong>in</strong>ion for the<br />
sake of all disciples to underst<strong>and</strong> [the two nirvana theory] easily.<br />
Question: When disjunction (visaNyoga) is atta<strong>in</strong>ed by a pKthagjana or UaikLa,<br />
which nirvana elements does it belong to? 38<br />
Answer: It does not belong to either of the two nirvana elements. [1] When<br />
disjunction is atta<strong>in</strong>ed by a pKthagjana, it can only be called ab<strong>and</strong>on<strong>in</strong>g<br />
120