05.03.2013 Views

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

Metaphor and Literalism in Buddhism: The ... - misterdanger.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNOTATED TRANSLATIONS OF THE RELATED TEXTS<br />

<strong>and</strong> so on’ is conventionally designated ( prajñapti) <strong>in</strong> respect of a person<br />

(pudgala). <strong>The</strong>re is no person but dharma <strong>in</strong> itself (dharmatA) <strong>in</strong> [nirvana<br />

without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g]; 34 it is not mentioned here.<br />

Discussions of the two nirvana theory<br />

Question: Can anyone admit that a sa<strong>in</strong>t (arahant) resides neither <strong>in</strong><br />

nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g nor <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? 35<br />

Answer: It is impossible by reason<strong>in</strong>g, yet it is possible from the def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

given here. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to them, it is nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g when<br />

all three th<strong>in</strong>gs are present, whereas it is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g when one of three th<strong>in</strong>gs is not present. [1] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born<br />

<strong>in</strong> the world of formlessness, he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />

of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce he cannot have a material body. As his m<strong>in</strong>d is active, he<br />

does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [2] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t<br />

who is born <strong>in</strong> the world of form <strong>and</strong> has entered the absorption of ext<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

(nirodhasamApatti), he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce his m<strong>in</strong>d is not active. As there is a material body, he does not<br />

reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g. [3] For a sa<strong>in</strong>t who is born<br />

<strong>in</strong> the world of desire but lacks his faculty, he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana<br />

with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce he cannot have the five faculties. As he<br />

has a material body he does not reside <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is an op<strong>in</strong>ion. 36 <strong>The</strong> text should be written as follows: what is<br />

nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? <strong>The</strong> complete cessation of all fetters<br />

(saNyojana) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed ( prApta), possessed ( pratilabdha), touched (spKLMa)<br />

<strong>and</strong> realised (sAkLAtkKta) by a sa<strong>in</strong>t while his vitality (Ayus) alone exists.<br />

What is nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g? A sa<strong>in</strong>t whose vitality has<br />

already come to an end ceases all fetters completely.<br />

In this way, when a sa<strong>in</strong>t is born <strong>in</strong> one of three worlds, whether he has a<br />

material body or not, whether his m<strong>in</strong>d is active or not, whether he has the<br />

five faculties or not, he resides <strong>in</strong> nirvana with a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g if his<br />

vitality exists. He resides <strong>in</strong> nirvana without a rema<strong>in</strong>der of cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g if his<br />

vitality has come to an end. Although it should be written <strong>in</strong> this way, it is<br />

not written. That is why the author of this treatise 37 gave this op<strong>in</strong>ion for the<br />

sake of all disciples to underst<strong>and</strong> [the two nirvana theory] easily.<br />

Question: When disjunction (visaNyoga) is atta<strong>in</strong>ed by a pKthagjana or UaikLa,<br />

which nirvana elements does it belong to? 38<br />

Answer: It does not belong to either of the two nirvana elements. [1] When<br />

disjunction is atta<strong>in</strong>ed by a pKthagjana, it can only be called ab<strong>and</strong>on<strong>in</strong>g<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!