22.03.2013 Views

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146<br />

Mastering <strong>Digital</strong> Printing<br />

<strong>Digital</strong> artist and printmaker JD Jarvis feels that digital work is held up to more rigorous<br />

demands than any other artwork. A gallery owner once was worried that his digital prints<br />

weren’t waterproof. “As if watercolors, photos, and lithos are?” he asked. “I’m making art,<br />

not foul-weather gear.”<br />

Notwithstanding the above arguments and anecdotes, most photographer-artists working<br />

digitally are rightly concerned about print permanence.<br />

Image-stability researcher Henry Wilhelm (see more about him below) brings the point<br />

home with a dramatic example. “The entire era of picture taking from 1942 to 1953 when<br />

people were using box cameras and Kodak’s new Kodacolor print process is lost forever,”<br />

he once explained to me. “There is not one single known print that survives today in reasonable<br />

condition; they are all severely stained and faded.” Pictures and prints are important<br />

to people. Maybe not all of them, but that doesn’t mean that none of them are! And<br />

in the digital age, this becomes even more important because, chances are, the digital files<br />

will not survive, but the prints will. “It’s always been about the print,” says Wilhelm, “and<br />

we can actually produce right now, at very low cost, extremely stable photographs and<br />

prints in color. Do we want to? Ask anybody, “Which would you rather have: a longerlasting<br />

print or a shorter-lasting one?” What do you think the answer will be?”<br />

Family photos have value, but most color prints from the ’40s, ’50s, and even ’60s are now faded or stained. Compare my family’s Kodalux print on the left from<br />

1968 with the Kodak black-and-white print on the right from 1953, which, apart from a slight yellowing on the edges, is otherwise in perfect condition. Both<br />

were stored in the same shoe box.<br />

I believe most photographer-artists sensibly want to be confident that the prints they are<br />

making—for themselves or for sale or gift to others—will last for a reasonable amount<br />

of time under normal conditions. (What “reasonable amount of time” and “normal conditions”<br />

actually mean is, of course, up for grabs.) As digital printing researcher Dr. David

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!