22.03.2013 Views

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Are Endpoints, and Why Are They Important?<br />

Many instrument-measured tests currently use densitometric endpoints—the point at which a test sample<br />

fails and the test ends. Initial starting densities are recorded on different neutral gray, pure color, and<br />

minimum density (“paper-white”) patches. When repeated measurements of the patches show that one<br />

has reached its allowed percentage of density change, that patch has reached its endpoint.<br />

Wilhelm Imaging Research uses a unique, endpoint criteria set that is visually weighted. Instead of uniform<br />

percentages across the board, WIR has employed focus groups and other psychometric factors to<br />

determine what changes are more acceptable than others. For example, most people will tolerate a<br />

Caucasian flesh tone going more red or pink but not more green. Also, WIR’s blue density change for<br />

paper-white has a higher limit that allows the paper to go yellower before failing. Wilhelm colleague<br />

Mark McCormick-Goodhart believes that’s because the human eye is adapted to campfire light, and we<br />

tend to accept some visual yellowing.<br />

The selection of the endpoints is very important in densitometric-based testing. If you want a sample to<br />

appear to be more long-lasting, all you have to do is increase the endpoint percentage so that it takes<br />

longer to reach it. That’s why some don’t agree with the industry standard 30-percent or more density<br />

loss. “Our opinion is that the 30–35-percent fade rate is too generous,” says InkjetMall’s Jon Cone.<br />

“While it makes for impressive ratings, it does not meet users’ expectations, especially when you realize<br />

that the threshold in humans for detecting fade is 5 percent.”<br />

ADDENDUM: Wilhelm and McCormick-Goodhart are now working on a new test method that is<br />

based not on densitometric endpoint criteria, but rather on CIELAB colorimetry. This is partly due to<br />

all the complexity in digital printing including multiple ink colors, unique black generation, etc. It is not<br />

known when this new test method will be accepted, although ASTM methods and other testers are<br />

already using variations of spectrophotometric measurements and Delta-E comparisons.<br />

A typical result of dark fading is the formation of yellow stain on color photographic or<br />

inkjet prints. Dark fading is not limited to dark storage, but since it is primarily due to<br />

the instability of the materials, it starts the moment the print is made and takes place independently<br />

and at the same time as any light-caused fading if the print is displayed.<br />

Different types of colorants or media will have different dark-fading rates, and the only<br />

way to know for sure is to wait for it to happen or to test it. Wilhelm Imaging Research<br />

now includes “dark storage stability—including paper yellowing” as an official category<br />

in its Display Permanence Ratings (DPR). In fact, Wilhelm now states that they won’t<br />

provide a DPR of greater than 100 years for any print material unless Arrhenius-accelerated<br />

dark storage stability test data indicates that the print can indeed last longer than<br />

those 100 years without noticeable deterioration.<br />

Lightfastness Tests<br />

All prints will photodegrade in the presence of light. That means that they undergo a photochemical<br />

reaction when exposed to lightwave photons, and they start to deteriorate. The<br />

changes can be in the form of fading, darkening, or changing hue (color). The more resistant<br />

a print is to this inexorable process, the more lightfast it is.<br />

Chapter 5 ■ Determining Print Permanence 157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!