22.03.2013 Views

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

Digital Prints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

■ Waterfastness (for waterfastness and outdoor durability: the drip test, the pour test, the<br />

standing water evaporation test, the standing water plus gentle wipe test, and the water<br />

smear test) (See Figure 5.5.)<br />

■ Humidity-fastness<br />

■ Fingerprint Test (for handling damage)<br />

■ Chemical and Biological Stability (to test resistance to attack by chemicals and biological<br />

agents)<br />

Choosing the Light<br />

Chapter 5 ■ Determining Print Permanence 159<br />

One big debate around lightfastness testing is this: What type of light source should be used in the testing? Here’s a quick rundown of the three<br />

main choices.<br />

Fluorescent has been the favorite of the major testing organizations and manufacturers for years, but it has obvious flaws, including not accurately<br />

simulating most indoor lighting conditions due to its unusual spectral power distribution (see accompanying illustration). Fluorescent is<br />

useful for prints destined for display exclusively in stores or offices, but many doubt its appropriateness otherwise.<br />

Natural sunlight is the original light source, and because it covers the spectral range with ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation, many<br />

use it for testing. Some, however, question its validity since added variables (like heat) are introduced. Also, natural sunlight may vary from<br />

season to season.<br />

Xenon arc lamp testing is done with a special device (see illustration on page 161 and Figure 5.9 in this chapter) that provides the best available<br />

approximation of full-spectrum sunlight. Using filters to simulate either sunlight through a window or direct outdoor exposure to sunlight, the<br />

other advantages of xenon arc testing are that the variables can be controlled, and the results are fast. The main disadvantage is the cost of the<br />

expensive machines.<br />

What’s the answer? ASTM’s approach is to specify in their D4303 standard that at least two of four different light-source conditions be tested and<br />

then compared: filtered xenon to simulate daylight, outdoor sunlight in Arizona, outdoor sunlight in Florida, and special fluorescent lamps (these<br />

may be removed in the next version of the standard). (See more about ASTM’s testing standards next).<br />

The spectral power distributions<br />

(SPDs) of three common light sources:<br />

sunlight through glass (gray), xenon arc<br />

(red), and cool white fluorescent (blue).<br />

Note how closely the sunlight and<br />

xenon match yet how different the<br />

fluorescent is.<br />

Courtesy of Q-Panel Lab Products

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!