22.03.2013 Views

Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the - Solar System ...

Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the - Solar System ...

Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the - Solar System ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preface<br />

Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g activities with<strong>in</strong> NASA’s <strong>Science</strong> Mission Directorate (SMD) draw heavily on<br />

reports issued by <strong>the</strong> National Research Council (NRC), particularly those from <strong>the</strong> Space Studies Board<br />

(SSB). Prime among <strong>the</strong>se SSB <strong>in</strong>puts is identification of priority science <strong>and</strong> missions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called<br />

decadal surveys. The last such study cover<strong>in</strong>g SMD’s activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> planetary sciences, New Frontiers<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Solar</strong> <strong>System</strong>: An Integrated Exploration Strategy, was published <strong>in</strong> 2003. That comprehensive<br />

study—<strong>the</strong> first true decadal strategy <strong>for</strong> this field—canvased planetary science activities, listed <strong>the</strong> key<br />

science questions, <strong>and</strong> recommended specific spacecraft missions <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 2003-2013.<br />

Supplemented by several subsequent SSB studies—e.g., Open<strong>in</strong>g New Frontiers <strong>in</strong> Space: Choices <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Next New Frontiers Announcement of Opportunity (2008), The Scientific Context <strong>for</strong> Exploration of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Moon (2007), <strong>and</strong> Grad<strong>in</strong>g NASA’s <strong>Solar</strong> <strong>System</strong> Exploration Program: A Midterm Report (2007)—<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2003 report provided key guidance <strong>for</strong> SMD’s planetary science programs dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first decade of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 21st century.<br />

The successful implementation of many of <strong>the</strong> missions recommended <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g studies,<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with important discoveries by a variety of ground- <strong>and</strong> space-based research activities, created<br />

<strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> a decadal survey of <strong>the</strong> planetary sciences. Thus, <strong>in</strong> December 2008, Edward J. Weiler,<br />

NASA’s associate adm<strong>in</strong>istrator <strong>for</strong> SMD, requested that a new decadal strategy study be <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

(Appendix A). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> request was seconded by <strong>the</strong> leadership of <strong>the</strong> National <strong>Science</strong><br />

Foundation’s (NSF’s) Division of Astronomical <strong>Science</strong>s. Specific tasks outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> request <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• An overview of planetary science—what it is, why it is a compell<strong>in</strong>g undertak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between space- <strong>and</strong> ground-based planetary science research;<br />

• A broad survey of <strong>the</strong> current state of knowledge of <strong>the</strong> solar system;<br />

• An <strong>in</strong>ventory of <strong>the</strong> top-level science questions that should guide flight programs <strong>and</strong><br />

support<strong>in</strong>g research programs;<br />

• Recommendations on <strong>the</strong> optimum balance among small, medium, <strong>and</strong> large missions <strong>and</strong><br />

support<strong>in</strong>g activities;<br />

• An assessment of NSF-supported <strong>in</strong>frastructure;<br />

• A discussion of strategic technology development needs <strong>and</strong> opportunities;<br />

• A prioritized list of major flight <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Frontiers <strong>and</strong> larger classes<br />

recommended <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation over <strong>the</strong> decade 2013-2022;<br />

• Recommendations <strong>for</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g research required to maximize <strong>the</strong> science return from <strong>the</strong><br />

flight <strong>in</strong>vestigations; <strong>and</strong><br />

• A discussion of <strong>the</strong> opportunities <strong>for</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g science <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g humans <strong>in</strong><br />

situ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> value of human-tended <strong>in</strong>vestigations relative to those per<strong>for</strong>med solely robotically.<br />

In response to this request, <strong>the</strong> NRC appo<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>the</strong> Committee on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Planetary</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Decadal<br />

Survey, consist<strong>in</strong>g of a 16-member steer<strong>in</strong>g group <strong>and</strong> 54 additional experts organized <strong>in</strong>to five topical<br />

panels. For reasons of consistency <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity, <strong>the</strong> panels were organized accord<strong>in</strong>g to planetary<br />

objects—i.e., <strong>in</strong>ner planets (Mercury, Venus, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Moon), Mars, giant planets, satellites of <strong>the</strong> giant<br />

planets, <strong>and</strong> primitive bodies—as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2003 planetary decadal survey. Unlike <strong>the</strong> 2003 survey,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> present survey omits an astrobiology panel; <strong>in</strong>stead, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with appropriate expertise<br />

were distributed among <strong>the</strong> five named panels.<br />

PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION<br />

ix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!