05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DECISION - 55<br />

269<br />

position to give his explanation. When the evidence is oral, normally<br />

the examination of the witness will in its entirety, take place before<br />

the party charged, who will have full opportunity of cross-examining<br />

him. The position is the same when the witness is called, the<br />

statement given previously by him behind the back of the party is put<br />

to him and admitted in evidence, a copy thereof is given to the party<br />

and he is given an opportunity to cross-examine him. To require in<br />

that case that the contents of the previous statement should be<br />

repeated by the witness word by word, and sentence by sentence, is<br />

to insist on bare technicalities, and rules of natural justice are matters<br />

not of form but of substance. They are sufficiently complied with<br />

when previous statements given by witnesses are read over to them,<br />

marked on their admission, copies thereof given to the person charged<br />

and he is given an opportunity to cross-examine them. The Supreme<br />

Court held that clause (8) of section 545 of the Bombay Police Manual<br />

which laid down the procedure cannot be held to be bad as<br />

contravening the rules of natural justice.<br />

(55)<br />

Order — when, it becomes final<br />

Before something amounts to an order, it must be<br />

expressed in the name of the appropriate authority<br />

and formally communicated to the person<br />

concerned. The authority concerned may<br />

reconsider the matter before the order is formally<br />

communicated and till then it is only of a provisional<br />

character. Chief Minister competent to call for any<br />

file pertaining to portfolio of any Minister.<br />

Bachittar Singh vs. State of Punjab,<br />

AIR 1963 SC 396<br />

The appellant was Assistant Consolidation Officer in the State<br />

of PEPSU. On receipt of certain complaints regarding tampering<br />

with official record he was suspended and an inquiry was held against<br />

him. As a result of the enquiry, he was dismissed on the ground that<br />

he was not above board and was not fit to be retained in service.<br />

The order was duly communicated to him and he submitted an appeal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!