05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DECISION - 271<br />

575<br />

Independence Act, 1947. But that would not have the effect of<br />

terminating the powers of the Governor General under the Ninth<br />

Schedule. Those powers will be available so long as the 1935 Act<br />

continues to be in power and the Federation is not established. This<br />

is the legal and constitutional result of the continuance of the 1935<br />

Act. The fact that the 1935 Act is continuing has been attested not<br />

only by the provisions of the Indian Independence Act of 1947 but<br />

also by Art. 395 of the Constitution of India. It is only by reason of the<br />

present Constitution, 1935 Act was repealed.<br />

Even on the assumption that the 1935 Act has ceased to be<br />

in existence after the inauguration of the Constitution of India in 1947<br />

it cannot be held that the provisions of the Ordinance had ceased to<br />

be operative in 1944. The Ordinance was validly enacted in 1944.<br />

There is nothing contained in the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance<br />

or in the 1935 Act limiting the operation and duration of the Ordinance<br />

upto a particular point of time. The fact that the 1935 Act has been<br />

repealed would not have the effect of erasing the law of the Ordinance<br />

made under that Act from the statute book.<br />

(271)<br />

Charge — amendment of<br />

Where charge is amended by issue of corrigendum<br />

during the course of inquiry, failure to permit charged<br />

official to file reply to amended charge and give<br />

opportunity to defend himself vitiates inquiry<br />

proceedings, and order of termination liable to be<br />

quashed.<br />

M.G. Aggarwal vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi,<br />

1987(4) SLR DEL 545<br />

The petitioner was Junior Engineer in the Municipal<br />

Corporation of Delhi. A charge sheet was served on him on 31-1-85<br />

alleging that he failed to detect unauthorised construction of some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!