VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DECISION - 503 909 The Division Bench of the High Court quashed the order on the ground that the Disciplinary Committee did not put forth adequate reasons for differing from the findings of the Inquiry Officer and did not discuss how the Inquiry Officer went wrong and why his findings were not acceptable to the Committee. The Division Bench upheld the contention of the first respondent that “when the Disciplinary Authority differed from the findings entered by an Inquiry Officer, it is imperative to discuss materials in detail and contest the conclusions of the Inquiry Officer and then record their own conclusions.” The Supreme Court held: “The reasoning of the High Court that when the Disciplinary Committee differed from the finding of the Inquiry Officer it is imperative to discuss the materials in detail and contest the conclusion of the Inquiry Officer, is quite unsound and contrary to the established principles in administrative law. The Disciplinary Committee was neither an appellate nor a revisional body over the Inquiry Officer’s report. It must be borne in mind that the inquiry is primarily intended to afford the delinquent officer a reasonable opportunity to meet the charges made against him and also to afford the punishing authority with the materials collected in such inquiry as well as the views expressed by the Inquiry Officer thereon. The findings of the Inquiry Officer are only his opinion on the materials, but such findings are not binding on the disciplinary authority as the decision-making authority is the punishing authority and, therefore, that authority can come to its own conclusion, of course bearing in mind the views expressed by the Inquiry Officer. But it is not necessary that the disciplinary authority should “discuss materials in detail and contest the conclusions of the Inquiry Officer.” Otherwise the position of the disciplinary authority would get relegated to a subordinate level. Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
910 DECISION - (504) (A) P.C. Act, 1988 — Sec. 13(1)(e) (B) Disproportionate assets — abetment by private persons Private persons liable under sec.109 IPC read with sec.13(1)(e) of P.C.Act, 1988. (C) P.C. Act, 1988 — Sec. 13(1)(e), Explanation (D) Disproportionate assets — income from known sources “Known sources of income” of public servant should be any lawful source and the receipt of such income should have been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law applicable. P.Nallammal vs. State, 2000(1) SLJ SC 320 Some of the former Ministers of the Tamil Nadu Government in the Ministry headed by the erstwhile Chief Minister Smt. Jayalalitha are being prosecuted before certain Special Courts for the offence, inter alia, under sec.13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The former speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly is also facing a similar charge. They are indicted on the premises that they were public servants during the relevant time and that each one has amassed wealth disproportionate to his/her known sources of income, for which he/she is unable to account. But in all such cases, some of their kith and kin are also being arraigned as coaccused to face the said offence read with sec.109 Indian Penal Code. Appellants herein are all those kith and kin who are now being proceeded against for the said offences in conjunction with the public servant concerned. The Supreme Court held that sec. 4 of the P.C. Act confers exclusive jurisdiction to Special Judges appointed under the P.C. Act 504
Page 1 and 2:
For official use only ANDHRA PRADES
Page 3 and 4:
2 DECISION - S.No. Name of Case Cit
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
10 DECISION - S.No. Name of Case Ci
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
28 DECISION - S.No. Name of Case 52
Page 31 and 32:
30 DECISION -
Page 33 and 34:
32 DECISION - 29. C.B.I. report —
Page 35 and 36:
34 DECISION - 86. Conviction — su
Page 37 and 38:
36 DECISION - 141. Disproportionate
Page 39 and 40:
38 DECISION - 195. Evidence — sta
Page 41 and 42:
40 DECISION - 253. Judgment — tak
Page 43 and 44:
42 DECISION - 311. P.C. Act, 1988
Page 45 and 46:
44 DECISION - 369. Principles of na
Page 47 and 48:
46 DECISION - 423. Sentence — ade
Page 49 and 50:
48 DECISION - 480. Trap — investi
Page 51 and 52:
50 DECISION -
Page 53 and 54:
52 DECISION - 11. Adverse remarks 1
Page 55 and 56:
54 DECISION - 27. Bribe-giver — p
Page 57 and 58:
56 DECISION - 16. State of Madhya P
Page 59 and 60:
58 DECISION - 60. Circumstantial ev
Page 61 and 62:
60 DECISION - 367.Union of India vs
Page 63 and 64:
62 DECISION - 78. Constitution of I
Page 65 and 66:
64 DECISION - 115. Bhagwat Parshad
Page 67 and 68:
66 DECISION - 520. Sheel Kumar Chou
Page 69 and 70:
68 DECISION - 98. Defence evidence
Page 71 and 72:
70 DECISION - 296.Kamruddin Pathan
Page 73 and 74:
72 DECISION - 110. Departmental act
Page 75 and 76:
74 DECISION - 503.High Court of jud
Page 77 and 78:
76 DECISION - 70. Sajjan Singh vs.
Page 79 and 80:
78 DECISION - 521.State vs. S. Bang
Page 81 and 82:
80 DECISION - 129.K. Srinivasarao v
Page 83 and 84:
82 DECISION - 318. B. Karunakar vs.
Page 85 and 86:
84 DECISION - 188. Evidence — ext
Page 87 and 88:
86 DECISION - 440. High Court of ju
Page 89 and 90:
88 DECISION - 214. I.P.C. — Sec.
Page 91 and 92:
90 DECISION - 468.B.Venkateswarulu
Page 93 and 94:
92 DECISION - 255.Shivaji Atmaji Sa
Page 95 and 96:
94 DECISION - 238. Inquiry report
Page 97 and 98:
96 DECISION - 253. Judgment — tak
Page 99 and 100:
98 DECISION - 267. Misconduct — a
Page 101 and 102:
100 DECISION - 372.S.B. Ramesh vs.
Page 103 and 104:
102 DECISION - 168.Natarajan vs. Di
Page 105 and 106:
104 DECISION - 303. Order — in cy
Page 107 and 108:
106 DECISION - 388.Rajasingh vs. St
Page 109 and 110:
108 DECISION - 418.State of Maharas
Page 111 and 112:
110 DECISION - 231.R.S. Nayak vs. A
Page 113 and 114:
112 DECISION - 115. Bhagwat Parshad
Page 115 and 116:
114 DECISION - 343. Penalty — red
Page 117 and 118:
116 DECISION - 265.Udaivir Singh vs
Page 119 and 120:
118 DECISION - 123.A.K. Kraipak vs.
Page 121 and 122:
120 DECISION - 329.Union of India v
Page 123 and 124:
122 DECISION - 392. Reasonable oppo
Page 125 and 126:
124 DECISION - 412. Revision / Revi
Page 127 and 128:
126 DECISION - 418. Sanction of pro
Page 129 and 130:
128 DECISION - 201.Hazari Lal vs. S
Page 131 and 132:
130 DECISION - 445. Suspension —
Page 133 and 134:
132 DECISION - 456. Suspension —
Page 135 and 136:
134 DECISION - 300. Shesh Narain Aw
Page 137 and 138:
136 DECISION - 476. Trap — legiti
Page 139 and 140:
138 DECISION - 201.Hazari Lal vs. S
Page 141 and 142:
140 DECISION - 522. Madhukar Bhaska
Page 143 and 144:
142 DECISION - 523.M.Narsinga Rao v
Page 145 and 146:
144 DECISION - 526. Witnesses — r
Page 147 and 148:
146 DECISION -
Page 149 and 150:
148 DECISION - 3. For a Digest of C
Page 151 and 152:
150 DECISION - to the High Court of
Page 153 and 154:
152 DECISION - assets, on acquittal
Page 155 and 156:
154 DECISION - termination of contr
Page 157 and 158:
156 DECISION -
Page 159 and 160:
158 DECISION - 2. Anant Wasudeo Cha
Page 161 and 162:
160 DECISION - 529. Bank of India v
Page 163 and 164:
162 DECISION - 288. Chairman, Nimba
Page 165 and 166:
164 DECISION - 430. Deputy Inspecto
Page 167 and 168:
166 DECISION - 452. Govt. of Andhra
Page 169 and 170:
168 DECISION - 330. In re Gopal Kri
Page 171 and 172:
170 DECISION - 532. K.C. Sareen vs.
Page 173 and 174:
172 DECISION - 97. M M. Gopalakrish
Page 175 and 176:
174 DECISION - 190. Mohd. Iqbal Ahm
Page 177 and 178:
176 DECISION - 504. P. Nallammal vs
Page 179 and 180:
178 DECISION - 422. Rajesh Kumar Ka
Page 181 and 182:
180 DECISION - 324. Sarup Singh, ex
Page 183 and 184:
182 DECISION - 428. State Bank of B
Page 185 and 186:
184 DECISION - 227. State of Madhya
Page 187 and 188:
186 DECISION - 396. State of Tamil
Page 189 and 190:
188 DECISION - 280. Tarsem Lal vs.
Page 191 and 192:
190 DECISION - 381. Union of India
Page 193 and 194:
192 DECISION -
Page 195 and 196:
194 DECISION - 2 The High Court fur
Page 197 and 198:
196 DECISION - 4 other monies of th
Page 199 and 200:
198 DECISION - 6 or dismissal withi
Page 201 and 202:
200 DECISION - 7 neither got it nor
Page 203 and 204:
202 DECISION - 10 The petitioner, a
Page 205 and 206:
204 DECISION -11 to sec. 19 of P.C.
Page 207 and 208:
206 DECISION -13 declared illegal.
Page 209 and 210:
208 DECISION -14 committed in the c
Page 211 and 212:
210 DECISION - 16 question. The Sup
Page 213 and 214:
212 DECISION - 17 The Supreme Court
Page 215 and 216:
214 DECISION -18 evidence on which
Page 217 and 218:
216 DECISION -19 The respondent was
Page 219 and 220:
218 DECISION -21 Mubarak Ali vs. St
Page 221 and 222:
220 DECISION - 22 were to ignore th
Page 223 and 224:
222 DECISION -23 compulsorily retir
Page 225 and 226:
224 DECISION - 23 the very nature o
Page 227 and 228:
226 DECISION - 24 on misconduct, ne
Page 229 and 230:
228 DECISION - 25 service. You shou
Page 231 and 232:
230 DECISION - 26 Distinction betwe
Page 233 and 234:
232 DECISION - 28 be so if it discl
Page 235 and 236:
234 DECISION - 30 High Court set as
Page 237 and 238:
236 DECISION - 32 State of Madhya P
Page 239 and 240:
238 DECISION - 33 deliberately cast
Page 241 and 242:
240 DECISION - 35 post. It is true
Page 243 and 244:
242 DECISION -36 (36) Compulsory re
Page 245 and 246:
244 DECISION - 37 (C) Preliminary e
Page 247 and 248:
246 DECISION - 38 liberally relied
Page 249 and 250:
248 DECISION - 40 issued notice ask
Page 251 and 252:
250 DECISION - 41 was controlled by
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
254 DECISION -43 (43) Further inqui
Page 257 and 258:
256 DECISION -44 and unlimited and
Page 259 and 260:
258 DECISION - 46 A disciplinary en
Page 261 and 262:
260 DECISION - 48 post. Again, some
Page 263 and 264:
262 DECISION - 50 Devendra Pratap N
Page 265 and 266:
264 DECISION - 51 participate in th
Page 267 and 268:
266 DECISION - 53 A probationer can
Page 269 and 270:
268 DECISION - 54 Manual, the Deput
Page 271 and 272:
270 DECISION -55 before the State G
Page 273 and 274:
272 DECISION - 56 State of Orissa v
Page 275 and 276:
274 DECISION - 58 The Deputy Commis
Page 277 and 278:
276 DECISION - 59 and that in the p
Page 279 and 280:
278 DECISION - 60 Appropriateness o
Page 281 and 282:
280 DECISION - 62 not being a penal
Page 283 and 284:
282 DECISION - 63 But the departmen
Page 285 and 286:
284 DECISION - 65 It was contended
Page 287 and 288:
286 DECISION - 66 observed that in
Page 289 and 290:
288 DECISION - 67 a first informati
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
292 DECISION - 69 the conclusion is
Page 295 and 296:
294 DECISION -70 Again, the form in
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
298 DECISION - 73 was legally only
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
302 DECISION - 77 holding the first
Page 305 and 306:
304 DECISION - 78 themselves should
Page 307 and 308:
306 DECISION - 80 has discharged it
Page 309 and 310:
308 DECISION - 81 purports to act a
Page 311 and 312:
310 DECISION - 82 jurisdiction and
Page 313 and 314:
312 DECISION - 84 two parts of the
Page 315 and 316:
314 DECISION - 86 (86) (A) Discipli
Page 317 and 318:
316 DECISION - 87 framed against a
Page 319 and 320:
318 DECISION - 88 (88) (A) Departme
Page 321 and 322:
320 DECISION - 90 against a Governm
Page 323 and 324:
322 DECISION - 90 the Government ha
Page 325 and 326:
324 DECISION - 92 is not in terms m
Page 327 and 328:
326 DECISION - 93 Head of a Departm
Page 329 and 330:
328 DECISION - 96 In this appeal, t
Page 331 and 332:
330 DECISION - 98 entitled to an op
Page 333 and 334:
332 DECISION -99 the Chancellor. Dr
Page 335 and 336:
334 DECISION -100 the appellant is
Page 337 and 338:
336 DECISION - 101 operation of Art
Page 339 and 340:
338 DECISION - 103 (C) Trap — inv
Page 341 and 342:
340 DECISION -104 burden of proof o
Page 343 and 344:
342 DECISION - 105 Court have fully
Page 345 and 346:
344 DECISION -106 Where power of ap
Page 347 and 348:
346 DECISION - 108 The High Court h
Page 349 and 350:
348 DECISION - 111 does not attach
Page 351 and 352:
350 DECISION - 113 Where Government
Page 353 and 354:
352 DECISION - 113 before the expir
Page 355 and 356:
354 DECISION -115 Disciplinary Auth
Page 357 and 358:
356 DECISION - 117 The respondent w
Page 359 and 360:
358 DECISION - 119 Kshirode Behari
Page 361 and 362:
360 DECISION - 121 Punjab. A depart
Page 363 and 364:
362 DECISION - 122 the rights acqui
Page 365 and 366:
364 DECISION - 123 does not impair
Page 367 and 368:
366 DECISION - 124 State of Punjab
Page 369 and 370:
368 DECISION - 126 way of bribery b
Page 371 and 372:
370 DECISION - 127 General of Polic
Page 373 and 374:
372 DECISION - 129 K. Srinivasarao
Page 375 and 376:
374 DECISION - 131 (131) Fresh inqu
Page 377 and 378:
376 DECISION - 133 (133) Charge —
Page 379 and 380:
378 DECISION -134 responsible offic
Page 381 and 382:
380 DECISION - 137 The respondent,
Page 383 and 384:
382 DECISION - 137 The disciplinary
Page 385 and 386:
384 DECISION - 139 Before the Supre
Page 387 and 388:
386 DECISION - 141 there on a surpr
Page 389 and 390:
388 DECISION - 143 The petitioners,
Page 391 and 392:
390 DECISION - 144 (144) (A) Suspen
Page 393 and 394:
392 DECISION - 146 The public serva
Page 395 and 396:
394 DECISION -148 (148) Compulsory
Page 397 and 398:
396 DECISION - 150 of the girls hos
Page 399 and 400:
398 DECISION - 152 court held the o
Page 401 and 402:
400 DECISION - 153 in that capacity
Page 403 and 404:
402 DECISION - 155 (i) Appreciation
Page 405 and 406:
404 DECISION -157 evidence of the t
Page 407 and 408:
406 DECISION - 158 opportunity to e
Page 409 and 410:
408 DECISION - 160 State of Punjab
Page 411 and 412:
410 DECISION - 162 ground that they
Page 413 and 414:
412 DECISION - 164 In the instant c
Page 415 and 416:
414 DECISION - 164 The respondent c
Page 417 and 418:
416 DECISION -165 aside the dismiss
Page 419 and 420:
418 DECISION - 166 be active applic
Page 421 and 422:
420 DECISION -168 wanted to adduce
Page 423 and 424:
422 DECISION -169 jurisdiction and
Page 425 and 426:
424 DECISION -170 cannot be used fo
Page 427 and 428:
426 DECISION - 171 (B) Principles o
Page 429 and 430:
428 DECISION -173 responsible offic
Page 431 and 432:
430 DECISION - 175 are affirmed by
Page 433 and 434:
432 DECISION -176 treated as a sepa
Page 435 and 436:
434 DECISION - 178 will not vitiate
Page 437 and 438:
436 DECISION -179 that bind or viti
Page 439 and 440:
438 DECISION - 181 (181) (A) Depart
Page 441 and 442:
440 DECISION -182 appellant’s con
Page 443 and 444:
442 DECISION - 185 (185) Terminatio
Page 445 and 446:
444 DECISION - 186 the rule is to w
Page 447 and 448:
446 DECISION - 188 Prakash Chand vs
Page 449 and 450:
448 DECISION -191 (1) by producing
Page 451 and 452:
450 DECISION -192 the section, as C
Page 453 and 454:
452 DECISION - 192 prescribed by Co
Page 455 and 456:
454 DECISION - 193 constitute misco
Page 457 and 458:
456 DECISION - 194 under secs. 409/
Page 459 and 460:
458 DECISION -195 Union of India vs
Page 461 and 462:
460 DECISION -197 be represented th
Page 463 and 464:
462 DECISION - 198 (198) (A) Termin
Page 465 and 466:
464 DECISION - 199 retirement canno
Page 467 and 468:
466 DECISION - 200 The petitioner i
Page 469 and 470:
468 DECISION - 201 (J) Cr.P.C. —
Page 471 and 472:
470 DECISION - 202 accepted the mon
Page 473 and 474:
472 DECISION - 203 established and
Page 475 and 476:
474 DECISION - 204 (204) Department
Page 477 and 478:
476 DECISION - 206 or the inducing
Page 479 and 480:
478 DECISION - 208 (208) Department
Page 481 and 482:
480 DECISION - 210 (210) (A) P.C. A
Page 483 and 484:
482 DECISION - 212 The presumptions
Page 485 and 486:
484 DECISION - 214 amend or modify
Page 487 and 488:
486 DECISION - 216 thereupon a fres
Page 489 and 490:
488 DECISION - 218 the Division Ben
Page 491 and 492:
490 DECISION - 219 (C) Trap — app
Page 493 and 494:
492 DECISION - 221 High Court is th
Page 495 and 496:
494 DECISION - 223 period of his of
Page 497 and 498:
496 DECISION - 224 was made in the
Page 499 and 500:
498 DECISION - 225 imposed the pena
Page 501 and 502:
500 DECISION - 227 (227) Misconduct
Page 503 and 504:
502 DECISION - 228 cannot look into
Page 505 and 506:
504 DECISION - 229 Government serva
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
508 DECISION - 231 (Corresponding t
Page 511 and 512:
510 DECISION - 232 On the issue, wh
Page 513 and 514:
512 DECISION - 233 status, the cour
Page 515 and 516:
514 DECISION - 234 State of U.P. vs
Page 517 and 518:
516 DECISION - 235 (B) Misconduct
Page 519 and 520:
518 DECISION - 236 kidnapped and ha
Page 521 and 522:
520 DECISION - 238 who has a person
Page 523 and 524:
522 DECISION - 239 prevailing unres
Page 525 and 526:
524 DECISION - 240 For this purpose
Page 527 and 528:
526 DECISION -240 The word “inqui
Page 529 and 530:
528 DECISION - 240 threats of viole
Page 531 and 532:
530 DECISION - 240 man was burnt al
Page 533 and 534:
532 DECISION - 242 leaving the plac
Page 535 and 536:
534 DECISION - 243 authority. The S
Page 537 and 538:
536 DECISION - 245 recorded earlier
Page 539 and 540:
538 DECISION - 247 will act as Supe
Page 541 and 542:
540 DECISION - 249 prosecution nor
Page 543 and 544:
542 DECISION - 250 not been confron
Page 545 and 546:
544 DECISION - 252 of Police, Indor
Page 547 and 548:
546 DECISION - 254 a similar charge
Page 549 and 550:
548 DECISION -256 case. The Supreme
Page 551 and 552:
550 DECISION - 257 Ram Chander vs.
Page 553 and 554:
552 DECISION - 258 Civil Services (
Page 555 and 556:
554 DECISION - 259 administrative a
Page 557 and 558:
556 DECISION - 259 be prematurely r
Page 559 and 560:
558 DECISION - 261 After amendment
Page 561 and 562:
560 DECISION - 262 (ii) Element of
Page 563 and 564:
562 DECISION - 263 any official fav
Page 565 and 566:
564 DECISION - 264 (264) (A) Fresh
Page 567 and 568:
566 DECISION - 267 Giasuddin Ahmed
Page 569 and 570:
568 DECISION - 267 departmental pro
Page 571 and 572:
570 DECISION - 267 conditions of se
Page 573 and 574:
572 DECISION - 269 an earlier occas
Page 575 and 576:
574 DECISION - 270 that the Inquiry
Page 577 and 578:
576 DECISION - 272 internal structu
Page 579 and 580:
578 DECISION - 273 (273) (A) Depart
Page 581 and 582:
580 DECISION - 274 opinion for prem
Page 583 and 584:
582 DECISION - 275 be attached to t
Page 585 and 586:
584 DECISION - 276 Government to dr
Page 587 and 588:
586 DECISION - 277 of the Inquiry O
Page 589 and 590:
588 DECISION - 278 of inquiry on th
Page 591 and 592:
590 DECISION - 279 (B) Increments
Page 593 and 594:
592 DECISION - 280 F.R. 25 to depri
Page 595 and 596:
594 DECISION - 282 Daya Shanker vs.
Page 597 and 598:
596 DECISION - 284 the findings of
Page 599 and 600:
598 DECISION - 286 The High Court o
Page 601 and 602:
600 DECISION - 287 remove some proc
Page 603 and 604:
602 DECISION - 288 (288) (A) Witnes
Page 605 and 606:
604 DECISION - 290 offence. Suspici
Page 607 and 608:
606 DECISION - 291 (ii) The three c
Page 609 and 610:
608 DECISION - 291 The department f
Page 611 and 612:
610 DECISION - 291 Government serva
Page 613 and 614:
612 DECISION - 292 scale on the Ban
Page 615 and 616:
614 DECISION - 293 The petitioner,
Page 617 and 618:
616 DECISION - 295 the charge of ma
Page 619 and 620:
618 DECISION - 297 the question is
Page 621 and 622:
620 DECISION - 299 (B) Court jurisd
Page 623 and 624:
622 DECISION -302 B.D. Arora vs. Se
Page 625 and 626:
624 DECISION - 303 explanation why
Page 627 and 628:
626 DECISION - 303 consideration of
Page 629 and 630:
628 DECISION - 305 continued till t
Page 631 and 632:
630 DECISION - 306 appeal. When two
Page 633 and 634:
632 DECISION - 307 or the punishing
Page 635 and 636:
634 DECISION - 308 sec. 5 (1) (e) o
Page 637 and 638:
636 DECISION - 310 the facts and ci
Page 639 and 640:
638 DECISION - 311 before the inqui
Page 641 and 642:
640 DECISION - 313 technical flaw,
Page 643 and 644:
642 DECISION - 314 the very outset
Page 645 and 646:
644 DECISION - 315 passengers inste
Page 647 and 648:
646 DECISION - 316 not see reason t
Page 649 and 650:
Page 651 and 652:
650 DECISION - 318 been examined de
Page 653 and 654:
652 DECISION - 318 the orders of re
Page 655 and 656:
654 DECISION - 320 Throughout the i
Page 657 and 658:
656 DECISION - 321 paramount import
Page 659 and 660:
658 DECISION -322 such statements a
Page 661 and 662:
660 DECISION -323 service. Conseque
Page 663 and 664:
662 DECISION - 324 each. Three othe
Page 665 and 666:
664 DECISION - 324 passengers would
Page 667 and 668:
666 DECISION -324 the punishing aut
Page 669 and 670:
668 DECISION -326 or rules made und
Page 671 and 672:
670 DECISION - 327 contemplated by
Page 673 and 674:
672 DECISION - 329 The promotion of
Page 675 and 676:
674 DECISION - 331 Santosh Chowdhar
Page 677 and 678:
676 DECISION - 333 the language whi
Page 679 and 680:
678 DECISION - 335 previous similar
Page 681 and 682:
680 DECISION - 337 imported in disc
Page 683 and 684:
682 DECISION - 338 was prosecuted b
Page 685 and 686:
684 DECISION - 339 for the trial of
Page 687 and 688:
686 DECISION - 340 there on receipt
Page 689 and 690:
688 DECISION - 341 inquiries where
Page 691 and 692:
690 DECISION - 342 Delhi Transport
Page 693 and 694:
692 DECISION - 344 Court also held
Page 695 and 696:
694 DECISION - 344 against whom dis
Page 697 and 698:
696 DECISION - 344 If any penalty i
Page 699 and 700:
698 DECISION - 344 investigation an
Page 701 and 702:
700 DECISION - 344 The Full Bench o
Page 703 and 704:
702 DECISION - 344 The Supreme Cour
Page 705 and 706:
704 DECISION - 344 DPC should consi
Page 707 and 708:
706 DECISION - 346 The Tribunal obs
Page 709 and 710:
708 DECISION - 348 Inspector of Pol
Page 711 and 712:
710 DECISION - 349 (349) Principles
Page 713 and 714:
712 DECISION - 350 view of sub-rule
Page 715 and 716:
714 DECISION - 352 13 charges are p
Page 717 and 718:
Page 719 and 720:
718 DECISION - 356 (356) (A) Cr.P.C
Page 721 and 722:
720 DECISION - 356 not justified in
Page 723 and 724:
722 DECISION - 356 The Superintende
Page 725 and 726:
724 DECISION - 358 (B) Charge — t
Page 727 and 728:
726 DECISION - 359 (359) Fresh inqu
Page 729 and 730:
728 DECISION - 361 not, is purely f
Page 731 and 732:
730 DECISION - 363 (363) (A) Miscon
Page 733 and 734:
732 DECISION - 365 Single Judge of
Page 735 and 736:
734 DECISION - 365 “a decision ha
Page 737 and 738:
736 DECISION - 367 as officer or se
Page 739 and 740:
738 DECISION - 369 second time. The
Page 741 and 742:
740 DECISION - 369 authority takes
Page 743 and 744:
742 DECISION - 369 of dismissal, re
Page 745 and 746:
744 DECISION - 370 the purpose of h
Page 747 and 748:
746 DECISION - 372 1974(1) SLR 67 a
Page 749 and 750:
748 DECISION - 374 petitioner conte
Page 751 and 752:
750 DECISION - 375 1994 Cri.L.J. BO
Page 753 and 754:
752 DECISION - 375 Referring to int
Page 755 and 756:
754 DECISION - 376 (A) P.C. Act, 19
Page 757 and 758:
756 DECISION -377 matters for a per
Page 759 and 760:
758 DECISION - 379 Witnesses shall
Page 761 and 762:
760 DECISION - 380 226. Power under
Page 763 and 764:
762 DECISION - 382 stage, the Tribu
Page 765 and 766:
764 DECISION - 384 the ground that
Page 767 and 768:
766 DECISION - 386 which denied sub
Page 769 and 770:
768 DECISION - 388 sec.7, 11, 13(2)
Page 771 and 772:
770 DECISION - 389 that the accepta
Page 773 and 774:
772 DECISION - 390 Laxman Lal vs. S
Page 775 and 776:
774 DECISION - 392 Committee of Man
Page 777 and 778:
776 DECISION - 394 punishing author
Page 779 and 780:
778 DECISION -395 by trial court, n
Page 781 and 782:
780 DECISION - 397 The appellant wa
Page 783 and 784:
782 DECISION - 398 facts and the co
Page 785 and 786:
784 DECISION - 399 Tribunal may int
Page 787 and 788:
786 DECISION - 401 money meant for
Page 789 and 790:
788 DECISION - 402 while he was jus
Page 791 and 792:
790 DECISION - 403 The High Court l
Page 793 and 794:
792 DECISION - 405 misconduct recei
Page 795 and 796:
794 DECISION - 407 departmental exo
Page 797 and 798:
796 DECISION - 408 the charge memo
Page 799 and 800:
798 DECISION - 410 limits of his au
Page 801 and 802:
800 DECISION - 412 prejudiced his c
Page 803 and 804:
802 DECISION - 412 members of the s
Page 805 and 806:
804 DECISION - 413 own facts and ci
Page 807 and 808:
806 DECISION - 415 charges of deman
Page 809 and 810:
808 DECISION - 416 into his pocket
Page 811 and 812:
810 DECISION - 418 (418) (A)P.C. Ac
Page 813 and 814:
812 DECISION - 420 an illegal act
Page 815 and 816:
814 DECISION - 420 regulations / st
Page 817 and 818:
816 DECISION - 420 found that the d
Page 819 and 820:
818 DECISION - 422 High Court set a
Page 821 and 822:
820 DECISION - 425 (425) (A) P.C. A
Page 823 and 824:
822 DECISION - 426 appellant ‘acc
Page 825 and 826:
824 DECISION - 427 The sanctioning
Page 827 and 828:
826 DECISION - 429 have stated oral
Page 829 and 830:
828 DECISION - 430 (430) (A) Court
Page 831 and 832:
830 DECISION - 433 petition, set as
Page 833 and 834:
832 DECISION - 434 case do not spec
Page 835 and 836:
834 DECISION - 435 one of the offic
Page 837 and 838:
836 DECISION - 437 would be undermi
Page 839 and 840:
838 DECISION - 439 (439) Administra
Page 841 and 842:
840 DECISION - 440 confidential rep
Page 843 and 844:
842 DECISION - 441 were made in his
Page 845 and 846:
844 DECISION - 444 The applicant, I
Page 847 and 848:
Page 849 and 850:
848 DECISION - 450 Rules, 1958 prov
Page 851 and 852:
850 DECISION - 453 proceedings were
Page 853 and 854:
852 DECISION - 456 suspension on 16
Page 855 and 856:
854 DECISION - 458 ground that the
Page 857 and 858:
856 DECISION - 460 is not an exhaus
Page 859 and 860: 858 DECISION - 462 The main content
Page 861 and 862: 860 DECISION - 463 respondent to pl
Page 863 and 864: 862 DECISION - 464 the Inquiry Offi
Page 865 and 866: 864 DECISION - 466 P.V. Narishmha R
Page 867 and 868: 866 DECISION - 467 The requirement
Page 869 and 870: 868 DECISION - 468 but for the sati
Page 871 and 872: 870 DECISION - 469 1999(1) SLJ CAT
Page 873 and 874: 872 DECISION - 471 Court jurisdicti
Page 875 and 876: 874 DECISION - 473 (473) (A) Miscon
Page 877 and 878: 876 DECISION - 474 decision in S. G
Page 879 and 880: 878 DECISION - 476 (476) Pension Ru
Page 881 and 882: 880 DECISION - 479 report referred
Page 883 and 884: 882 DECISION - 481 enquiry was orde
Page 885 and 886: 884 DECISION - 484 State of U.P. vs
Page 887 and 888: 886 DECISION - 485 (ii) On the fact
Page 889 and 890: 888 DECISION - 486 subsistence allo
Page 891 and 892: 890 DECISION - 487 For the aforesai
Page 893 and 894: 892 DECISION - 488 ‘property’ w
Page 895 and 896: 894 DECISION - 490 necessary even i
Page 897 and 898: 896 DECISION - 492 them off by orde
Page 899 and 900: 898 DECISION - 495 The Tribunal hel
Page 901 and 902: 900 DECISION - 498 the case and doi
Page 903 and 904: 902 DECISION - 500 (500) P.C. Act,
Page 905 and 906: 904 DECISION - 502 after registrati
Page 907 and 908: 906 DECISION - 502 agreeing with th
Page 909: 908 DECISION - 503 swayed by insign
Page 913 and 914: 912 DECISION - 505 public servant,
Page 915 and 916: 914 DECISION - 506 were cited to sp
Page 917 and 918: 916 DECISION - 508 Lily Thomas vs.
Page 919 and 920: 918 DECISION - 509 which deters him
Page 921 and 922: 920 DECISION - 511 Commissioner of
Page 923 and 924: 922 DECISION - 512 that the date of
Page 925 and 926: 924 DECISION - 514 (514) (A) C.C.A.
Page 927 and 928: 926 DECISION - 516 cannot be correc
Page 929 and 930: 928 DECISION - 518 filing of the ch
Page 931 and 932: 930 DECISION - 521 The petitioner p
Page 933 and 934: 932 DECISION - 523 paid to him by a
Page 935 and 936: 934 DECISION - 523 The Supreme Cour
Page 937 and 938: 936 DECISION - 525 of his official
Page 939 and 940: 938 DECISION - 526 compensation pay
Page 941 and 942: 940 DECISION - 527 prosecution havi
Page 943 and 944: 942 DECISION - 528 not direct that
Page 945 and 946: 944 DECISION - 528 Sec. 5(3) of the
Page 947 and 948: 946 DECISION - 529 So long as there
Page 949 and 950: 948 DECISION - 531 (531) Penalty
Page 951 and 952: 950 DECISION - 532 K.C. Sareen vs.
Page 953 and 954: 952 DECISION - 533 (D) Court jurisd
Page 955 and 956: 954 DECISION - 535 Gurdial Singh vs
Page 957 and 958: 956 DECISION - 536 the integrity an
Page 959 and 960: 958 DECISION - 538 been done in dis
Page 961 and 962:
960 DECISION - 539 (ii) It is not n
Page 963 and 964:
962 DECISION - 541 5(1)(c) of the P
Page 965 and 966:
964 DECISION - 542 assistance of an
Page 967 and 968:
966 DECISION - 542 for defence. So
Page 969 and 970:
968 DECISION - 544 and authorising
Page 971 and 972:
970 DECISION - 545 (A) P.C. Act, 19
Page 973 and 974:
972 DECISION - 546 under sec. 20 of
Page 975 and 976:
974 DECISION - 547 (547) Witnesses
Page 977 and 978:
976 DECISION - 549 akin to or on th
Page 979 and 980:
978 DECISION - 550 Under the repeal
Page 981 and 982:
980 DECISION - 551 documents which
Page 983 and 984:
982 DECISION - 551 may apply in a g
Page 985:
984 DECISION - 551 State (Delhi Adm
show all

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?