05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

878 DECISION - 476<br />

(476)<br />

Pension Rules — four-year limitation<br />

Proceedings in respect of misconduct stretching<br />

from 1992 to December, 1993, not time bared where<br />

charge sheet is issued to the Government servant<br />

on 02.08.97, after his retirement on 31.10.1996.<br />

Mohd. Tahseen vs. Government of A.P.,<br />

1999(4) SLR <strong>AP</strong> 6<br />

Petitioner, Additional Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad,<br />

retired from service on 31-10-96. A charge sheet was issued to him<br />

on 2-8-97, after his retirement. Petitioner contended that the action<br />

was time-barred because the misconduct which took place in 1992<br />

was beyond 4 years prior to the institution of the proceedings.<br />

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that though the first<br />

misconduct attributed to him was related to December 1992, the<br />

matter did not end there and the petitioner continued his involvement<br />

in the affair in which the allegation is that he abused his official position<br />

and falsely detained an innocent person in illegal custody to extract<br />

some reimbursement of amount from that person said to have been<br />

illegally collected from some one who seems to have approached<br />

the petitioner for redressal, in December 1993. The allegation of<br />

misconduct includes the period in December 1993 which appears to<br />

be continuation from December 1992. There is nothing to show that<br />

the entire incident attributing misconduct to the petitioner falls beyond<br />

four years from the date of institution of departmental inquiry, namely,<br />

2-8-97. There is no illegality or violation of any rulesm.<br />

(477)<br />

Conduct Rules — acquisition of property by wife<br />

Acquisition of property by wife in her name, where<br />

not paid for by the Government Servant, not<br />

attracted by Conduct Rules.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!