05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DECISION - 145<br />

391<br />

effect of suspending the contract of service. Besides, all that is<br />

required for the purpose of rule 16(3) of the All India Services (DCRB)<br />

Rules is that the employee should be a member of the All India<br />

Services, that he should have attained the age of 50 years or<br />

completed 30 years of service and the retirement should be in public<br />

interest. Thus, for the application of this rule, it is immaterial whether<br />

the employee is in active service or is on leave or is on deputation or<br />

is under suspension, as under all these contingencies he continues<br />

to be a member of the Service. In fact, rules 12(i), 12(iii) and 6(2)<br />

expressly contemplate the retirement of a member of the Service<br />

while under suspension. Considering all this, retirement of a member<br />

of the Service under rule 16(3) while he is under suspension is legally<br />

competent. Since the retirement was ordered in public interest, it did<br />

not amount to a punishment.<br />

(145)<br />

Penalty — minor penalty, in major penalty proceedings<br />

Minor penalty can be imposed without holding<br />

inquiry where major penalty proceedings are<br />

initiated.<br />

I.D. Gupta vs. Delhi Administration,<br />

1973(2) SLR DEL 1<br />

The petitioner was an Assistant Gram Ekai Organiser in the<br />

Directorate of Industries of Delhi Administration. Major penalty<br />

proceedings were initiated against the public servant under rule 14<br />

of the Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965. On receipt of a<br />

detailed statement of defence in reply to the charge-sheet for major<br />

penalty proceedings, the disciplinary authority was of the opinion that<br />

imposition of major penalty on the public servant, was not justified<br />

and that imposition of a minor penalty would meet the ends of justice.<br />

The disciplinary authority, therefore, imposed a minor penalty of<br />

censure on the public servant without holding a detailed oral inquiry<br />

as prescribed for major penalty action.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!