05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

294 DECISION -70<br />

Again, the form in which the order terminating the services<br />

of a temporary government servant is expressed will not be decisive.<br />

If a formal departmental enquiry has been held in which findings<br />

have been recorded against the temporary servant and as a result of<br />

the said findings his services are terminated, the fact that the order<br />

by which his services are terminated ostensibly purports to be a mere<br />

order of discharge would not disguise the fact that in substance and<br />

in law the discharge in question amounts to the dismissal of the<br />

temporary servant. It is the substance of the matter which determines<br />

the character of the termination of services. The real character of<br />

the termination of services must be determined by reference to the<br />

material facts that existed prior to the order.<br />

(70)<br />

(A) P.C. Act, 1988 — Sec. 13(1)(e)<br />

(B) Disproportionate assets — known sources of<br />

income<br />

(C) Disproportionate assets — margin to be allowed<br />

(i) Known sources of income refers to sources known to the<br />

prosecution.<br />

(ii) Appreciation of extent of disproportion of assets over<br />

savings.<br />

Sajjan Singh vs. State of Punjab,<br />

AIR 1964 SC 464<br />

The Supreme Court held that the expression ‘known sources<br />

of income’ must have reference to sources known to the prosecution<br />

on a thorough investigation of the case and it could not be contended<br />

that ‘known sources of income’ meant sources known to the accused.<br />

The Supreme Court observed that there is some force in the<br />

contention of the appellant that the legislature had not chosen to<br />

indicate what proportion would be considered disproportionate and<br />

on that basis the court should take a liberal view of the excess of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!