05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

310 DECISION - 82<br />

jurisdiction and it is a complete control except in matter of<br />

appointment, posting, promotion and dismissal and<br />

removal of District Judges. High Court alone can<br />

hold an inquiry against a District Judge.<br />

State of West Bengal vs. Nripendra Nath Bagchi,<br />

AIR 1966 SC 447<br />

The respondent was acting as a District and Sessions Judge<br />

and was due to superannuate and retire on 31-7-53. The Government<br />

ordered that he be retained in service for a period of two months<br />

commencing from 1-8-53. By another order, the respondent was<br />

placed under suspension and an enquiry into certain charges followed.<br />

The enquiry continued for a long time and the respondent was retained<br />

in service. A show cause notice was issued, the Public Service<br />

Commission consulted and he was dismissed from service.<br />

The Supreme Court held that rule 75(a) of the West Bengal<br />

Civil Service Regulations is intended to be used to keep in<br />

employment persons with a meritorious record of service, who<br />

although superannuated, can render some more service and whose<br />

retention in service is considered necessary on public grounds. This<br />

meaning is all the more clear when the rule states that a Government<br />

servant is not to be retained after he attains the age of sixty years,<br />

except in very special circumstances. This language hardly suits<br />

retention for purposes of departmental enquiries. The retention of<br />

the respondent in service under rule 75(a) for the purpose of holding<br />

a departmental enquiry was not proper and the extension of service<br />

was illegal.<br />

The Supreme Court also held that the control vested in the<br />

High Court under Art. 235 of Constitution includes disciplinary<br />

jurisdiction and is a complete control subject only to the power of the<br />

Governor in the matter of appointment (including dismissal and<br />

removal) and posting and promotion of District Judges. The High<br />

Court can in the exercise of the control vested in it, hold enquiries,<br />

impose punishment other than dismissal or removal, subject,<br />

however, to the conditions of service, and a right of appeal if granted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!