05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 DECISION -<br />

238. Inquiry report — should be reasoned one<br />

241.Anil Kumar vs. Presiding Officer, 531<br />

1985(3) SLR SC 26<br />

239. Inquiry report — enclosures<br />

143.Collector of Customs vs. Mohd. Habibul Haque, 388<br />

1973(1) SLR CAL 321<br />

240. Inquiry report — furnishing copy<br />

340.Union of India vs. Mohd. Ramzan Khan, 686<br />

1991(1) SLR SC 159 : AIR 1991 SC 471<br />

369. Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad vs. B. Karunakar, 738<br />

1993(5) SLR SC 532 : AIR 1994 SC 1074<br />

380. State Bank of India vs. Samarendra Kishore Endow, 758<br />

1994 (1) SLR SC 516<br />

241. Inquiry report — disciplinary authority in<br />

agreement with findings<br />

276.Ram Kumar vs. State of Haryana, 584<br />

1987(5) SLR SC 265<br />

242. Inquiry report — disciplinary authority<br />

disagreeing with findings<br />

67. Union of India vs. H.C. Goel, 288<br />

AIR 1964 SC 364<br />

86. State of Madras vs. A.R. Srinivasan, 314<br />

AIR 1966 SC 1827<br />

463.Punjab National Bank vs. Kunj Behari Misra, 860<br />

1998(5) SLR SC 715<br />

503.High Court of judicature at Bombay vs. 908<br />

Shashikant S. Patil,<br />

2000(1) SLJ SC 98<br />

243. Integrity<br />

(see “Misconduct — absolute integrity”)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!