05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338 DECISION - 103<br />

(C) Trap — investigation illegal, effect of<br />

(i) Permission to investigate the case under section<br />

5A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947<br />

(corresponding to sec. 17 of P.C. Act, 1988) includes<br />

laying a trap.<br />

(ii) Illegality of investigation by an officer not<br />

competent does not vitiate the jurisdiction of court<br />

for trial.<br />

(D) P.C. Act, 1988 — Sec. 20<br />

(E) Trap — burden of proof<br />

Burden of proof resting on accused public servant<br />

under section 4 of Prevention of Corruption Act,<br />

1947 (corresponding to sec. 20 of P.C. Act, 1988)<br />

is satisfied if he establishes his case by<br />

preponderance of probability.<br />

(F) P.C. Act, 1988 — Sec. 19<br />

(G) Sanction of prosecution — under P.C. Act<br />

Sanction of prosecution granted by the Head of<br />

Department not competent to remove the public<br />

servant from service, is not valid.<br />

Sailendra Bose vs. State of Bihar,<br />

AIR 1968 SC 1292<br />

The appellant was Assistant Medical Officer in Railway<br />

Hospital. Doman Ram, a Khalasi, who was suffering from dysentry<br />

and stomach pain was sent to the appellant for treatment. The<br />

prosecution case was that before giving him fitness certificate,<br />

appellant demanded Rs. 5 as bribe. The matter was reported to the<br />

Special Police Establishment and a trap was laid. The appellant<br />

admitted that Doman Ram had paid him Rs. 5 but claimed that it was<br />

a return of the loan given to him.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!