05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DECISION - 428<br />

825<br />

and this may be done in cases of grave nature involving questions of<br />

fact and law. It means that not only the charges must be grave but<br />

the case must also involve complicated questions of law and fact.<br />

The disciplinary proceedings are meant not really to punish the guilty<br />

but to keep the administrative machinery unsullied by getting rid of<br />

bad elements. The interest of the delinquent officer also lies in a<br />

prompt conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings. If he is not guilty<br />

of the charges, his honour should be vindicated at the earliest possible<br />

moment and if he is guilty, he should be dealt with promptly according<br />

to law. It is not also in the interest of administration that persons<br />

accused of serious misdemeanour should be continued in office<br />

indefinitely, ie., for long periods awaiting the result of criminal<br />

proceedings. It only serves the interest of the guilty and dishonest.<br />

(428)<br />

(A) Cr.P.C. — Sec. 161<br />

(B) Witnesses — examination of<br />

Statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. being<br />

taken on record after being read over and its<br />

affirmation by the witness, is not illegal.<br />

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur vs. Srinath Gupta,<br />

1997(1) SLJ SC 109 : AIR 1997 SC 243<br />

The respondent, Head-Cashier of State Bank of Bikaner &<br />

Jaipur was dismissed from service on 27-6-79 on charges of<br />

demanding and accepting bribes for arranging sanction of bank loans,<br />

and other acts of corruption. The High Court, however, by judgment<br />

dated 5-8-92 quashed the order on the ground that the statements<br />

recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. were admitted as evidence.<br />

The Supreme Court held that the statements under section<br />

161 Cr.P.C. may not be admissible in the criminal trail. In the instant<br />

disciplinary inquiry, the person who made the statement has been<br />

examined before the inquiry officer. It was open to the witness to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!