05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

674 DECISION - 331<br />

Santosh Chowdhary, Chairman of the Punjab Public Service<br />

Commission alleging that Shri Gopal Krishna Saini, a Member of the<br />

Commission gave her a full-blooded hard slap across her face in the<br />

office premises of the Commission on 24.11.1982 at about 1.15 p.m.<br />

when she enquired him the reasons for his absence on the previous<br />

two days, the Supreme Court observed as follows:<br />

“Persons occupying high public offices should maintain<br />

irreproachable behaviour. A certain minimum standard of code of<br />

conduct is expected of them. What may be excusable for an<br />

uneducated young man cannot be tolerated if a Member of a Public<br />

Service Commission is involved. Besides, it has to be remembered<br />

that the respondent and the Chairman were not thrashing out a<br />

personal matter or a private dispute. They were discussing a question<br />

involving their office and this in broad-day-light in the open corridor<br />

of the Commission’s building. Whatever the provocation offered by<br />

the Chairman, the respondent was not justified in losing his cool to<br />

the extent of indulging in physical violence. That the violence should<br />

have been directed against a lady makes his conduct all the more<br />

reprehensible. In our view, Shri Saini miserably failed in maintaining<br />

the standard of conduct expected of a Member of the Commission<br />

and thereby brought great disrepute to his office. Hence our answer<br />

to the question referred by the President is that Shri Saini’s conduct<br />

amounted to misbehaviour within the meaning of Article 317 (1) of<br />

the Constitution and it rendered him liable to be removed from his<br />

office of the Member of the Public Service Commission”.<br />

(331)<br />

Writ petition — interim orders<br />

Supreme Court deprecated issue of interim orders<br />

by courts and tribunals.<br />

Rana Randhir Singh vs. State of U.P.,<br />

1990(3) SLJ SC 42<br />

While disposing of writ petitions under Art. 32 of the<br />

Constitution by a set of direct recruits to the U.P. Police Service Class<br />

II and by a set of promotees to the said service, where the dispute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!