05.04.2013 Views

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

VIGILANCE MANUAL VOLUME III - AP Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

482 DECISION - 212<br />

The presumptions under these provisions are rebuttable but<br />

in the absence of proof to the contrary, the presumption of proper<br />

service or effective service on the addressee would arise, which must<br />

mean service of everything that is contained in the notice. It cannot<br />

be said that before knowledge of the contents of the notice could be<br />

imputed, the sealed envelop must be opened and read by the<br />

addressee or when the addressee happens to be an illiterate person<br />

the contents should be read over to him by the postman or someone<br />

else. Such things do not occur when the addressee is determined to<br />

decline to accept the sealed envelop.<br />

(212)<br />

(A) Cr.P.C. — Sec. 197<br />

(B) Sanction of prosecution — under Sec. 197 Cr.P.C.<br />

Medical Officer issuing a post-mortem certificate<br />

alleged to be false. Offence deemed to have been<br />

committed while purporting to act in the discharge<br />

of official duty as a Public servant. Sanction of<br />

Government before prosecution essential under<br />

section 197 Cr.P.C.<br />

Dr. P. Surya Rao vs. Hanumanthu Annapurnamma,<br />

1982(1) SLR <strong>AP</strong> 202<br />

The petitioner is a Medical Officer who conducted a postmortem<br />

examination and issued a certificate. A private complaint<br />

was filed against him and 3 others under sections 302, 447, 197 and<br />

201 I.P.C. alleging that he colluded with the others who committed<br />

the offence of tresspass and murder, by issuing a false certificate of<br />

post-martem. The petitioner contended before the Andhra Pradesh<br />

High Court that sanction from Government is required for his<br />

prosecution, under section 197 Cr.P.C.<br />

The High Court held that the petitioner is indisputably a public<br />

servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!