Soil Survey of Murray and Whitfield Counties, Georgia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

274 Soil Survey Log Landings, Hazard of Erosion, and Suitability for Roads on Forestland—Continued ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | Map symbol | Suitability for | Hazard of erosion | Suitability for roads and soil name | _____________________________________________________________________________ log landings | on roads and trails | (natural surface) | Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | limiting features | | limiting features | | limiting features | | | | | | | EuC: | | | | | | Enders------------------|Moderately suited | |Severe | |Moderately suited | | Slope |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | Urban land--------------|Not rated | |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | | | | | | | | FtB: | | | | | | Fullerton---------------|Well suited | |Moderate | |Well suited | | | | Slope/erodibility|0.50 | | | | | | | | FtD: | | | | | | Fullerton---------------|Moderately suited | |Severe | |Moderately suited | | Slope |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |0.50 | | | | | | FtE: | | | | | | Fullerton---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | FtF: | | | | | | Fullerton---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | FuE: | | | | | | Fullerton---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | Urban land--------------|Not rated | |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | | | | | | | | GrA: | | | | | | Guthrie-----------------|Poorly suited | |Slight | |Poorly suited | | Wetness |1.00 | | | Wetness |1.00 | Ponding |0.50 | | | Ponding |0.50 | Flooding |0.50 | | | Flooding |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | HcB: | | | | | | Hanceville--------------|Moderately suited | |Moderate | |Moderately suited | | Low strength |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | HcD: | | | | | | Hanceville--------------|Moderately suited | |Severe | |Moderately suited | | Slope |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | HcE: | | | | | | Hanceville--------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | HnC: | | | | | | Hanceville--------------|Moderately suited | |Severe | |Moderately suited | | Slope |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |0.50 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | Urban land--------------|Not rated | |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Murray and Whitfield Counties, Georgia 275 Log Landings, Hazard of Erosion, and Suitability for Roads on Forestland—Continued ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | Map symbol | Suitability for | Hazard of erosion | Suitability for roads and soil name | _____________________________________________________________________________ log landings | on roads and trails | (natural surface) | Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value| Rating class and |Value ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | limiting features | | limiting features | | limiting features | | | | | | | HrF: | | | | | | Hector------------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | Townley-----------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | Low strength |0.50 | | | Low strength |0.50 | | | | | | Rock outcrop------------|Not rated | |Not rated | |Not rated | | | | | | | | | | | | | HsB: | | | | | | Holston-----------------|Well suited | |Moderate | |Well suited | | | | Slope/erodibility|0.50 | | | | | | | | HsD: | | | | | | Holston-----------------|Moderately suited | |Severe | |Moderately suited | | Slope |0.50 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |0.50 | | | | | | JfF: | | | | | | Jefferson---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | Sandiness |0.50 | | | Sandiness |0.50 | | | | | | JfG: | | | | | | Jefferson---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | Sandiness |0.50 | | | Sandiness |0.50 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | | | JsE: | | | | | | Junaluska---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | JsF: | | | | | | Junaluska---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | JsG: | | | | | | Junaluska---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | JtE: | | | | | | Junaluska---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | Tsali-------------------|Poorly suited | |Moderate | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.50 | Slope |1.00 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | | | JtF: | | | | | | Junaluska---------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | | | | | | Tsali-------------------|Poorly suited | |Severe | |Poorly suited | | Slope |1.00 | Slope/erodibility|0.95 | Slope |1.00 | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | Rock fragments |0.50 | | | | | |
Page 1:
United States Department of Agricul
Page 4 and 5:
ii National Cooperative Soil Survey
Page 6 and 7:
CkE—Cataska channery silt loam, 5
Page 8 and 9:
WnB—Waynesboro sandy loam, 2 to 6
Page 10 and 11:
Prime Farmland and Other Important
Page 13 and 14:
Soil Survey of Murray and Whitfield
Page 15 and 16:
Murray and Whitfield Counties, Geor
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
General Soil Map Units The general
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
24 Soil Survey Soils that have prof
Page 38 and 39:
26 Soil Survey Available water capa
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
30 Soil Survey 14 to 51 inches—re
Page 44 and 45:
32 Soil Survey Subsoil: 13 to 18 in
Page 46 and 47:
34 Soil Survey BoE—Bodine very gr
Page 48 and 49:
36 Soil Survey Recreational develop
Page 50 and 51:
38 Soil Survey Woodland Potential p
Page 52 and 53:
40 Soil Survey Suitability to pastu
Page 54 and 55:
42 Soil Survey Use and Management L
Page 56 and 57:
44 Soil Survey 32 to 54 inches—da
Page 58 and 59:
46 Soil Survey Management concerns:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
50 Soil Survey 20 to 28 inches—ye
Page 64 and 65:
52 Soil Survey Land capability clas
Page 66 and 67:
54 Soil Survey Urban development Su
Page 68 and 69:
56 Soil Survey Woodland Potential p
Page 70 and 71:
58 Soil Survey EdF—Edneytown loam
Page 72 and 73:
60 Soil Survey Management concerns:
Page 74 and 75:
62 Soil Survey Capshaw, Conasauga,
Page 76 and 77:
64 Soil Survey Soil Properties and
Page 78 and 79:
66 Soil Survey Subsoil: 3 to 6 inch
Page 80 and 81:
68 Soil Survey Flooding: None Slope
Page 82 and 83:
70 Soil Survey HcB—Hanceville loa
Page 84 and 85:
72 Soil Survey HcE—Hanceville loa
Page 86 and 87:
74 Soil Survey HrF—Hector-Townley
Page 88 and 89:
76 Soil Survey Minor Components Alb
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
80 Soil Survey Soil Properties and
Page 94 and 95:
82 Soil Survey Underlying material:
Page 96 and 97:
84 Soil Survey Land capability clas
Page 98 and 99:
86 Soil Survey Suitability to hay:
Page 100 and 101:
88 Soil Survey Urban land Urban lan
Page 102 and 103:
90 Soil Survey Typical Profile Mont
Page 104 and 105:
92 Soil Survey Soils that have bedr
Page 106 and 107:
94 Soil Survey Permeability: Modera
Page 108 and 109:
96 Soil Survey Subsurface layer: 5
Page 110 and 111:
98 Soil Survey NeE—Nella gravelly
Page 112 and 113:
100 Soil Survey Woodland Potential
Page 114 and 115:
102 Soil Survey PaE—Panama very g
Page 116 and 117:
104 Soil Survey Recreational develo
Page 118 and 119:
106 Soil Survey SaA—Sequatchie lo
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
110 Soil Survey 12 to 40 inches—y
Page 124 and 125:
112 Soil Survey Root zone: Shack—
Page 126 and 127:
114 Soil Survey Substratum: 45 to 5
Page 128 and 129:
116 Soil Survey Subsoil: 7 to 16 in
Page 130 and 131:
118 Soil Survey Surface layer: 0 to
Page 132 and 133:
120 Soil Survey Flooding: None Slop
Page 134 and 135:
122 Soil Survey Land capability cla
Page 136 and 137:
124 Soil Survey Urban development S
Page 138 and 139:
126 Soil Survey Preferred trees to
Page 140 and 141:
128 Soil Survey WaA—Wax fine sand
Page 142 and 143:
130 Soil Survey Preferred trees to
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
134 Soil Survey Cropland, hayland,
Page 148 and 149:
136 Soil Properties and Qualities D
Page 150 and 151:
138 Soil Survey on the use and the
Page 152 and 153:
140 Soil Survey are grouped accordi
Page 154 and 155:
142 Soil Survey Virgin forest once
Page 156 and 157:
144 Soil Survey In the tables descr
Page 158 and 159:
146 Soil Survey observed in the soi
Page 160 and 161:
148 Soil Survey Local roads and str
Page 162 and 163:
150 Soil Survey The ratings are bas
Page 165 and 166:
Soil Properties 153 Data relating t
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Page 172 and 173:
160 Soil Survey series. A pedon, a
Page 174 and 175:
162 Soil Survey Parent material: Co
Page 176 and 177:
164 Soil Survey pale brown (10YR 6/
Page 178 and 179:
166 Soil Survey A or Ap horizon: Co
Page 180 and 181:
168 Soil Survey Depth to seasonal h
Page 182 and 183:
170 Soil Survey coarse irregular so
Page 184 and 185:
172 Soil Survey BC horizon (where p
Page 186 and 187:
174 Soil Survey Slope range: 0 to 5
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
178 Soil Survey Capshaw soils, whic
Page 192 and 193:
180 Soil Survey medium, and few coa
Page 194 and 195:
182 Soil Survey Depth to hard bedro
Page 196 and 197:
184 Soil Survey Guthrie Series Majo
Page 198 and 199:
186 Soil Survey Typical Pedon Hance
Page 200 and 201:
188 Soil Survey Parent material: Lo
Page 202 and 203:
190 Soil Survey roots and common co
Page 204 and 205:
192 Soil Survey Slope range: 0 to 2
Page 206 and 207:
194 Soil Survey R—39 inches; hard
Page 208 and 209:
196 Soil Survey Depth class: Shallo
Page 210 and 211:
198 Soil Survey Bt horizon: Color
Page 212 and 213:
200 Soil Survey Panama Series Major
Page 214 and 215:
202 Soil Survey topographic quadran
Page 216 and 217:
204 Soil Survey medium subangular b
Page 218 and 219:
206 Soil Survey E horizon (where pr
Page 220 and 221:
208 Soil Survey Shelocta Series Maj
Page 222 and 223:
210 Soil Survey fine, fine, medium,
Page 224 and 225:
212 Soil Survey Geographically Asso
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
216 Soil Survey Typical Pedon Wax f
Page 230 and 231:
218 Soil Survey Range in Characteri
Page 233 and 234:
Formation of the Soils This section
Page 235 and 236: Murray and Whitfield Counties, Geor
Page 237 and 238: References American Association of
Page 239 and 240: Glossary 227 Many of the terms rela
Page 251: Murray and Whitfield Counties, Geor
Page 254 and 255: Temperature and Precipitation (Reco
Page 256 and 257: 244 Soil Survey Acreage and Proport
Page 258 and 259: 246 Soil Survey Acreage and Proport
Page 260 and 261: 248 Soil Survey Nonirrigated Yields
Page 266 and 267: 254 Soil Survey Prime Farmland and
Page 268 and 269: 256 Soil Survey Forestland Producti
Page 282 and 283: 270 Soil Survey Log Landings, Hazar
Page 294 and 295: 282 Soil Survey Forestland Planting
Page 308 and 309: 296 Soil Survey Camp Areas and Picn
Page 320 and 321: 308 Soil Survey Playgrounds and Pat
Page 334 and 335: 322 Soil Survey Dwellings (The info
Page 336 and 337:
324 Soil Survey Dwellings—Continu
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
336 Soil Survey Roads and Streets a
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
350 Soil Survey Sewage Disposal (Th
Page 364 and 365:
352 Soil Survey Sewage Disposal—C
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
368 Soil Survey Source of Sand, Roa
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
384 Soil Survey Ponds and Embankmen
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Engineering Properties—Continued
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
428 Soil Survey Physical and Chemic
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
442 Soil Survey Water Features (Dep
Page 456 and 457:
444 Soil Survey Water Features—Co
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
450 Soil Survey Soil Features (See
Page 464 and 465:
452 Soil Survey Soil Features—Con
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 471:
NRCS Accessibility Statement The Na
show all

Soil Survey of Murray and Whitfield Counties, Georgia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?