06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An individual's preferences are said to satisfy the weak additivity axiom if his preference<br />

between two /-normal lottery tickets in a given pair is independent of the level of z, for all<br />

pairs of f-normal lottery tickets and all t.<br />

(f) Interpret the weak additivity axiom.<br />

(g) Show that if an individual's preferences satisfy the weak additivity axiom, then u is<br />

ordinally additive.<br />

(h) Show that an individual's preferences satisfy the weak additivity axiom if and only<br />

if u is additive or log additive.<br />

Pollak (1967) summarizes his findings as follows:<br />

The strong additivity axiom is satisfied if and only if the von Neumann-Morgenstern<br />

utility function is the sum of functions each of which depends on the level of consumption<br />

in a single period. The weak additivity axiom is satisfied in this case and is also<br />

satisfied if the von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function can be written as the<br />

product of functions each of which depends on the level of consumption in a single<br />

period. Furthermore, these are the only cases in which the weak additivity axiom is<br />

satisfied.<br />

The assumption that an individual's von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function<br />

is ordinally additive is a severe restriction on his preferences; it is equivalent to the<br />

assumption that his ordinal utility function is additive. The assumption that his<br />

von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function is additive or log additive implies a<br />

more severe restriction on preferences, namely, that they satisfy the weak additivity<br />

axiom. The assumption that his von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function is<br />

additive implies a still more severe restriction, namely, the strong additivity axiom.<br />

Simplifications resulting from special assumptions about the form of the von<br />

Neumann-Morgenstern utility function are paid for in lost generality and applicability.<br />

By expressing these assumptions in terms of preferences, it may be easier to assess<br />

their cost.<br />

4. Suppose/(x) is positive and is defined on the open convex set C in E".<br />

(a) Show that /is convex on C if log /is convex on C.<br />

(b) Show that /is pseudo-concave on C if log /is concave on C.<br />

5. Suppose/, gi,...,g„: R"-* R, where/is pseudo-concave and the gj are quasi-concave.<br />

Show that x* solves {max/(*)|g,(x)jg0, i=l,...,«} if and only if it solves the problem<br />

with a linear objective function {maxV/(x*)'x|0i(x)=:O, /= 1,...,«}.<br />

6. Consider the problem<br />

Z(a,b) = min/(a,x),<br />

s.t. g(x) Si, x £ 0,<br />

where x e E", b e E m , g: E" -» E m , a e A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!