06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

302 REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES<br />

III. Variations in risk aversion<br />

If the investor's attitude towards risk alters then this will alter the form of (3.10).<br />

A decrease in risk aversion can either be reflected by a decrease in a (dotted line (3.16)<br />

in Figure 9) or a decrease in the value of B (dotted line (3.15) in Figure 9).<br />

(3.10)<br />

The discussion so far has assumed that there exists at least one asset which is riskless<br />

and which the investor holds. As a rule this riskless asset is assumed to be money. Considering<br />

the variations in purchasing power it may currently be a doubtful assumption<br />

to suppose that an investor considers money riskless. It might therefore be of some<br />

interest to study the case when all assets are risky.<br />

(b) All assets risky<br />

Assume that a choice is to be made between two investment projects. We assume<br />

that the amounts of money invested in these two projects are xs and x2. The returns,<br />

arising in the next period are r, and r2 per unit of x, and x2 respectively. As in the previous<br />

discussion we assume that ry and r2 are normally distributed with mean iil and \x2 and<br />

variance a\ and a\ respectively.<br />

We maximize the expected return in the second period while requiring that the probability<br />

that the return is equal to or higher than a certain value B is at least a. The proportional<br />

tax is 1(0 i ( S 1) and the lump sum tax is K. Thus we have the problem<br />

subject to<br />

max EixsiQ -i)+x2r2(l - /) - K),<br />

Xy+x2 £ M,<br />

P(xiri(\-t)+x2r2(l-t)-K g B) S a,<br />

xu x2 i 0.<br />

PART III. STATIC PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODELS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!