06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ergodic theory, the book by Breiman (1968) should be consulted. Additional<br />

results on first passage times for finite Markov chains are obtained in Exercise<br />

ME-17, and applied to a numerical example in Exercise CR-15. The results<br />

in Exercises ME-14-ME-17 are applied to the problem of random walk with<br />

reflecting boundaries in Exercise ME-18. For additional material on Markov<br />

chains, the reader may consult Bharucha-Reid (1960), Breiman (1968), Feller<br />

(1962), Hillier and Lieberman (1967), Howard (1960), Kemeny and Snell<br />

(1960), Kushner (1971), and Ross (1970). For renewal theory and some of its<br />

applications, see Breiman (1968), Cox (1962), Feller (1962, 1966), and Ross<br />

(1970).<br />

The basic results of Miller and Orr, as generalized by Weitzman (1968),<br />

are given in Exercise ME-19. In their original paper of 1966, Miller and Orr<br />

assumed equal costs for transfers to or from the cash balance. Weitzman<br />

generalized the results to unequal transfer costs, and studied the sensitivity<br />

of the optimal policy as a function of the transfer costs' ratio. As noted in<br />

part (e) of Exercise ME-19, the optimal policy is only slightly affected by this<br />

ratio, for realistic values. In a recent paper, Miller and Orr (1968) have studied<br />

in some detail the adequacy of their original assumptions. They demonstrate<br />

that the assumption of a Bernoulli random walk can be generalized without<br />

significant effect on the optimal cash balance policy. They show how more<br />

general cash balance dynamics can be well approximated by mixtures of<br />

Bernoulli random walks, and they present methods for the solution of such<br />

problems. They discuss the possibility of more complex cost structures,<br />

including both fixed and proportional components for cash transfers. They<br />

also treat the interesting case of a "three asset" model, where in addition to<br />

idle cash there exist two alternative earning accounts: a high yield, relatively<br />

illiquid account, and a lower yield, highly liquid "buffer" account. Unfortunately,<br />

space limitations prevent the inclusion of most of these interesting<br />

topics. However, the results for fixed plus proportional transfer costs are<br />

outlined in Exercise ME-20.<br />

The Miller and Orr theory of cash balance management assumed the firm's<br />

operating procedure to be of the simple control-limit type. In many "inventory<br />

theoretic" cases, especially those involving complex cost structures (nonconvexities,<br />

price breaks, etc.), such partial optimization over a set of simple<br />

policies is the most that can be achieved, since the actual form of truly<br />

optimal policies may be unknown. Even if optimal policies are known, they<br />

may be sufficiently complicated from an operating point of view that suboptimization<br />

(over simple policies) is actually preferable in practical cases.<br />

This view, based on the paper by Karlin (1958), is the one adopted by Miller<br />

and Orr. Other work on the cash balance problem concerns the actual<br />

form of optimal policies. Eppen and Fama (1968) treated the cash balance<br />

problem using linear programming. They assumed linear holding and penalty<br />

INTRODUCTION 445

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!