06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

andom variables when the utility functions are quadratic or cubic. In<br />

Exercise ME-5 another type of dominance relation of relevance to convex<br />

costs rather than concave utilities, is considered. Exercise ME-11 examines<br />

dominance relations for concave utility functions which are not assumed to be<br />

nondecreasing. Exercise ME-7 illustrates the caution which must be exercised<br />

when dealing with dominance relations, in that the addition of a random<br />

variable to each side of the relation may render it invalid. It should be noted<br />

that all such dominance relations are relevant only to the problem of choosing<br />

one random variable from a given set of random variables. In the portfolio<br />

problem, the possibility of investing partially in each of several assets will<br />

generally introduce all of the random assets into the optimal solution, even<br />

if one of them strictly dominates the others. This diversification behavior is<br />

illustrated in the extreme in the paradoxical Exercise CR-12. Stochastic<br />

dominance relations between different total portfolios are what matters in the<br />

portfolio allocation problem. Exercise ME-22 utilizes stochastic dominance<br />

results in the analysis of a reinsurance problem.<br />

The Brumelle and Vickson paper examines stochastic ordering relations<br />

from a unified view, based on recent work in the field of measure theory.<br />

The emphasis is on simple tools which permit better understanding of the<br />

underlying structure of such dominance relations, and which allow some new<br />

dominance relations to be discovered in a straightforward manner. The<br />

"technical" level of the paper is not unduly high, but the general tone is<br />

perhaps somewhat abstract. The paper emphasizes the fact that most of the<br />

interesting classes of utility functions are convex sets in a function space, in<br />

the sense that they are closed under addition and multiplication by nonnegative<br />

constants. If the sets are represented as closed convex hulls of their<br />

extreme points (just as for convex sets in ordinary Euclidean space), then<br />

necessary and sufficient conditions for dominance are obtained by restricting<br />

one's attention to the extreme points. Since the extreme points can often be<br />

determined by inspection, the stochastic dominance tests drop out immediately.<br />

The paper reexamines first- and second-degree dominance from this viewpoint,<br />

and then treats the interesting case of third-degree dominance. This is the<br />

ordering relation relevant to the class of concave nondecreasing utility functions<br />

having nonnegative third derivative (i.e., having convex first derivative).<br />

The interest in this class arises from the fact that it includes many of the<br />

economically relevant utility functions for wealth. This ordering relation was<br />

introduced by Whitmore (1970). In Exercise ME-6 it is shown that thirddegree<br />

dominance is equivalent to an ordering of double integrals of cumulative<br />

distributions. Exercise ME-20 extends the theory to nth-degree stochastic<br />

dominance.<br />

The paper also discusses an alternative formulation of second-degree<br />

dominance which emphasizes the underlying probabilistic content of the<br />

ordering. The ordering is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a bivariate<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!