06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Parts IV and V of the volume discuss dynamic models with uncertainty<br />

taken into account in the decision-making process. Some models can be reduced<br />

to or analyzed as static models in some way and the papers by Wilson, Fama<br />

and Hakansson discuss three such ways to do this. Wilson's model has a single<br />

decision point. Fama shows the result that many dynamic stochastic models are<br />

equivalent to a static model where the future period's random variables have<br />

been eliminated through the expectation operator and the future period's<br />

decision variables have been optimized out. This notion has been used in the<br />

stochastic programming literature since the early paper of Dantzig (1955) and is<br />

standard in the current theoretical literature, see e.g. Birge and Louveaux (1997)<br />

or Wets and Ziemba (1999). This analysis assumes that the distributions of the<br />

random variables are independent of the decisions made. The results show that<br />

concavity is preserved over maximization and expectation but strict concavity is<br />

not preserved without additional assumptions; see Ziemba (1974, 1977) on this<br />

latter point.<br />

Mossin (1968) showed that for essentially unconstrained dynamic investment<br />

problems with power utility functions, the optimal policy was myopic if<br />

the asset returns were intertemporally independent. Hakansson's paper showed<br />

that if the objective function was logarithmic, then an optimal myopic policy<br />

existed for general dependent assets. This paper and those by Breiman and<br />

Thorp in Section 4 of Part V concern the extremely important but little used<br />

(except by some rather talented people discussed below) Kelly (1956) capital<br />

growth theory.<br />

Section V concerns dynamic models and begins with Vickson's intuitive<br />

discussion of the ltd calculus for stochastic differential equations and stochastic<br />

optimal control used in continuous time finance. The only real continuous time<br />

paper in the volume is Merton's in Section IV. Two major areas have evolved<br />

out of continuous time finance whose father is Robert C. Merton, the Nobel<br />

prize winner in economics in 1997 for his work related to the Black-Scholes<br />

(1973) and Merton (1973) option pricing model. The area has exploded with<br />

thousands of articles and hundreds of books on option pricing models and<br />

applications published since these fundamental contributions were made. Our<br />

book just touches the surface of such work so we refer readers to such option<br />

pricing and derivative security books as Rubinstein (1998), Duffie (2001),<br />

Shreve (2004), Hull (2006), and Wilmott (2006). In this area, the continuous<br />

time modeling is crucial to the option pricing. One area of use is in hedge fund<br />

mispricing that is "buy A and sell A*", a close substitute but which is more<br />

expensive. Then wait in this risk arbitrage until the prices converge within a<br />

xvin<br />

PREFACE AND BRIEF NOTES TO THE 2006 EDITION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!