06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(f) Show that k > 0.<br />

[Note (Exercise CR-10) that the sign of 8x/dw0 is positive, zero, or negative as the absolute<br />

risk-aversion function — u"(w)/u'(w) is decreasing, constant, or increasing in w.]<br />

(g) Show that x & 0, and decreasing absolute risk aversion implies that dx/da\,=0 is<br />

positive.<br />

(h) Indicate when 6xj8cn\,=0 is negative and interpret this result.<br />

Consider a change in expectations such that all possible expectations of £ are multiplied by<br />

a factor of X.<br />

(i) Show that x = x/X satisfies the first- and second-order conditions for a maximum.<br />

(j) Interpret the result of (i) and indicate how the result is useful for policy purposes<br />

to encourage or discourage investment in the risky currency.<br />

Consider a change in the dispersion of £ about a constant expected value. Let 0 = a+b£,<br />

where a = 0, b = 1 indicates the initial position. Increasing b tends to stretch the distribution<br />

of d; since all outcomes are multiplied by a number larger than 1. To keep the mean constant<br />

a must be adjusted so that it satisfies<br />

d& = da + db% = 0 or da/db = -|.<br />

(k) Show that the first-order conditions become<br />

E\—(a+b£)u'[(l + r)w0 + (a+b?)x] =0 when rf® = 0.<br />

(1) Utilize the results of (e) and (k) to show that<br />

(dxldb)imM = -x-^dx/dtx).<br />

(m) Show that x and J have the same sign, and that if { > 0 and u has decreasing absolute<br />

risk aversion, (dxjdb)? „„„, is negative.<br />

(n) Indicate when {dxjdb)i const is positive and interpret this result.<br />

4. Referring to the introduction to Exercise 3 suppose that the speculator may invest in<br />

n forward exchange positions, i = 1,...,«, where xt refers to the investment level in currency i<br />

and £[ to the random profit made per dollar invested in ;'. The problem is then to choose<br />

x = (*!,...,x„) to maximize Eu(yv) = Eu[(l +r)w0 +£'*]•<br />

(a) Show that first- and second-order conditions for expected utility maximization are<br />

E[(u'(w)~\ = 0 (n equations) and E[££'u"(w)] negative definite. Show that these conditions<br />

are sufficient for x to be the unique maximum.<br />

Consider a shift in the mean of the /th return from |( to |, + a,.<br />

(b) Utilize the first-order conditions to show that a small change in a, evaluated at<br />

a, = 0 with expected utility remaining maximized leads to the first-order condition<br />

£[f£'""(w)]( 0 */dai)«i=o = £[£«"( w)]*i + [m] (n equations),<br />

where [m] is a column vector of zeros except for ~E[u'(w)] in the /th component.<br />

(c) Utilize the first-order conditions to show that<br />

E[tf'u"(w)][dxldw0] = £K«»](1+/-).<br />

(d) Show that the results in (b) and (c) imply that<br />

(0x,/0a,)„,=o = Su + Xl{dxjjSw0)l(\ + r),<br />

where Su = —E[u'(wy]Dij/D, D is the determinant of the matrix E[(£'u"(w)], and Du<br />

is the cofactor of the y th element of D.<br />

184 PART II. QUALITATIVE ECONOMIC RESULTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!