06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9. Let the partial relative risk-aversion function P(t; w) and relative risk-aversion function<br />

R(J) be defined as in Exercise 8.<br />

(a) Let w be fixed. Show that if P(t;w) is nonincreasing in / for t in some interval (0, /0)<br />

with t0 > 0, then either<br />

(i) P(t; w) = 0 [so «"(/+ w) = 0 for 0 < / < to], or<br />

(ii) w = 0.<br />

Let w > 0 be fixed, and suppose that t0 > 0.<br />

(b) Show that if Pit; w) is monotone (strictly monotone) in t for 0 < / < t0, then it is<br />

nondecreasing (strictly increasing) for 0 < t < t0.<br />

(c) Show that if R(t) is nondecreasing, then either<br />

(i) u"(t) = 0, or<br />

(ii) P(t; w) is strictly increasing in t for each w.<br />

10. Consider a strictly increasing utility function u{w) which is concave and bounded on<br />

[), co). It is of interest to examine the behavior of R(w) = — wu"(w)/u'(w) for large and small<br />

values of w. Suppose there exist numbers r and w0 > 0 such that R(w) ^r for w^w0.<br />

(a) Show that<br />

(b) Show that<br />

u'(w) £ cw~' for w a w0, where c = H'(WO) Wo' > 0.<br />

W(H>)<br />

u(w0) + -^—[w i - r -wh~ r ], r*\<br />

\—r<br />

u{w0) + c[logH> — logWo], r — 1.<br />

(c) Show that R(w) cannot converge to a limit which is less than 1 as w -> oo.<br />

(d) Show that R(w) cannot converge to a limit which is greater than 1 as w-*0. This<br />

shows that Riyv) must be increasing on the average, from values somewhat less than 1 for<br />

small w to values somewhat greater than 1 for large w.<br />

11. Suppose the random variables X and Y have distributions F and G, respectively, and<br />

that<br />

(i) /"^(G—F) du & 0 for all concave nondecreasing u, and<br />

(ii) S-„(G—F)du^0 for all concave nonincreasing «.<br />

(a) Show that Ji« [G0)-F(/)] dt^O for all x and J»M [G(/)-F(/)] dt = 0.<br />

(b)* Either verify the converse of (a), i.e., that the conditions in (a) imply (i)-(ii), or<br />

find a counterexample.<br />

(c) Show that (i)-(ii) is equivalent to Eu(X) £ Eu(Y) for all concave u, provided all the<br />

integrals involved exist and are finite.<br />

12. Let X and Y be discrete random variables concentrated on the finite set of points<br />

Q = {ai,a2, ...,«„} c \a,b~\. Let Xt be a discrete random variable concentrated on fi, and<br />

let pi = P[X= a,], pi' = P[Xi = a,]. Xt is said to differ from X by a mean-preserving<br />

spread (MPS) if<br />

(i) pi — p^ except for four values ilt i2, '3, and i4, with a(l S a,-2 g a,3 g at4;<br />

(«i) /»i',-^i, =PH~P'H S 0, p,3-pi3=Pu-Pu = °:<br />

(iii) EJ 4 =1ai,(/>o-/>(j) = 0.<br />

188 PART II. QUALITATIVE ECONOMIC RESULTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!