06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(i) Suppose that V0 is positive definite. Show that the aspiration model has as its<br />

deterministic equivalent<br />

mm(c'x-d0)l(xV0xy n , s.t. Ax ^ b, x 6 0,<br />

assuming x = 0 is not optimal.<br />

(j) Show that x = 0 is optimal for the aspiration model if and only if d0 & 0.<br />

27. Suppose investments X and Y have a common mean and finite positive variances.<br />

Suppose an investor has initial wealth of one dollar and has a strictly increasing and strictly<br />

concave utility function over wealth w. To maximize expected utility, one must maximize<br />

{(X) = Eu[XX+(\ — A)y]|0S X g 1}. It is of interest to investigate how diversification is<br />

affected by possible negative dependence between X and Y.<br />

(a) Suppose X has a uniform distribution on [0,1] and that Y =— \2X 1 +\QX—\.<br />

Show that cov (X, Y) = - i < 0 and EX = EY = i.<br />

(b) Suppose that<br />

{X if X£ TV,<br />

u(X) = U- + 0 is sufficiently small. Show that « is strictly increasing, strictly concave, and<br />

differentiable.<br />

(c) Show that X* = 1 so that it is not optimal to diversify. [Hint: Show that d(\)ldX =<br />

£[«'(*)(*-r)]>0.]<br />

(d) Suppose X arxA u are as defined in (a) and (b), and that Y= MX 1 — lOA'+i. Show<br />

that EX= EY= i, cov(X,Y) > 0, and that 0 < X* < 1. Hence, negative correlation is<br />

neither necessary nor sufficient for diversification.<br />

(e) Show that X* < 1 if and only if E[{X- Y) «'(*)] < 0.<br />

(f) Show that the hypotheses with regard to the result in (e) may be weakened so that<br />

u is concave and not necessarily differentiable or u is pseudo-concave. Show that the<br />

monotonicity assumption is crucial, however.<br />

(g) Show that 0 < X* if and only if E[(Y- X) «'(T)] < 0.<br />

(h) Show that there is diversification, that is, 0 < X* < 1, if and only if<br />

/•CO 1*2 j*GO /»2<br />

(x-y)dF(x,y) SO and (y-x)dF(x,y) ^ 0<br />

Jy= — oo Jx= — co Jx= — 00 Jy= — oo<br />

for all z, provided that E[(X-Y)u'(X)] ^ 0 # E[(Y-X) u'(Y)l<br />

(i) Use (h) to show that if all risk-averse investors should diversify between X and Y,<br />

then EX = EY. [Hint: Let z -> oo.]<br />

28. Refer to Exercise 27. It is of interest to develop a concept of negative dependence that<br />

always leads to diversification in the two-asset case.<br />

(a) Suppose that E(Y | X = x) is a strictly decreasing function of x. Show that it is optimal<br />

to hold some Y that is X* < 1. [Hint: Show that<br />

E[(X-Y)u\X)] = cov[A-,«'W] - cov[E(Y\X),u'(X)] < 0.<br />

(b) Suppose that E(X\ Y = y) is a strictly decreasing function of y. Show that it is optimal<br />

to hold some X. Hence if both conditional means are decreasing functions, the investor<br />

will always diversify.<br />

(c) Show that if P[YiS y | X= x] is strictly increasing in x for each y, then E(Y\X= x)<br />

is strictly decreasing in x, and that the converse is false.<br />

(d) Show that if E(Y\X=x) is strictly decreasing in x, then co\(X,Y) < 0 and the<br />

converse is false.<br />

360 PART III STATIC PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODELS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!