06.06.2013 Views

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

STOCHASTIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ASYMPTOTIC VALIDITY OF QUADRATIC UTILITY<br />

III. The Log-Normal Case<br />

In this section the "compactness" characteristic of the log-normal distribution<br />

is derived. First the dominated convergence of the continuous density<br />

(\jt)pt{W) as t, W->Q is established; subsequently, exact order properties of<br />

E{W— 1)" for n = 1,2,..., are proved. It is assumed that (logX,, ....logA^)'<br />

is distributed in the multivariate normal form with parameters<br />

and<br />

(ElogXi,...,ElogXm)' s {tnu...,tnm) = tii<br />

[cov(log*i, log*})] = [/*,] = /£.<br />

In other words, the expected growth and variance of growth are linear in time,<br />

and all increments are independently distributed. For obvious reasons, this<br />

process is referred to as a stationary "geometric" Wiener process (see Merton<br />

[4]). As it turns out, the Xt's, and W =^dXiXi, are not quite "compact" in<br />

the sense of Samuelson; i.e., assumption Al is not satisfied. However, the<br />

moments are sufficiently well behaved to assure quadratic utility as / -> 0;<br />

i.e., they will satisfy Theorem 1 and Corollary II for all A e D. For simplicity,<br />

we first analyze the univariate case and write ££{X) ~ MLl (///, ta 2 ) to denote<br />

that the probability law of X is log-normal with parameters tfi and ta 2 .<br />

Theorem III Let p,(x) and p0(x) be the densities of two (independent) lognormal<br />

random variables specified by MLi{tfi,ta 2 ) and ML1(0,1), respectively.<br />

Then, there exist a t0 and e such that<br />

for all t e (0, /0) and x e [0, e) = Su<br />

(llt)Pt(x)^p0(x)<br />

Proof The density pt(x) oc x~ l {ta 2 y 1 ' 2 exp{-i(logx-/^) 2 (m 2 ) -1 };<br />

hence if the function g(y, t) is defined by<br />

9{y,t) = Pt{x){ta 2 YI 2 lp0{x)Y x = exp{-i[(^-/,i) 2 (rff 2 )- 1 -/]}<br />

where y = log x, then it suffices to show that<br />

t ~ 1 v (x)<br />

0 yeSi' Po( X )<br />

where Sx' = (—oo,loga), t e (0, t0), and g(y,t) is defined on 5,'^(0,/0).<br />

Let t0 = inf{|, |^|,|l//i|,o-" 2 } and let loge = S be any fixed number less<br />

than — 1. It is then straightforward to verify that<br />

sup g(y,t) ^ cxp{-i(5 2 + 2dt)(r l -l)}<br />

1. MEAN-VARIANCE AND SAFETY-FIRST APPROACHES 229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!